RFFM.ORG

Anthony Sowell, John Muhammad: Serial Killers Not Just White Males Any Longer

Media & Authorities Slow or Reluctant to Acknowledge Mass Murderers Come in All Colors:  Playing the Race Card:  Does it Apply When Not Politically Correct? 

 

by Daniel T. Zanoza, Executive Director

 

According to FBI statistics, at any given time there are 30 to 50 serial killers roaming the United States, seeking out their prey.  76% of all serial killers worldwide perform their dark and evil murders in the United States.  Europeans represent 17% of the world's serial killers.  In totality, the United States and Europe combined make up 93% of all mass murderers internationally. 

 

In the U.S., California holds the dubious distinction of the most homicidal maniacs, followed by Texas, New York, Illinois and Florida.  There have been no reports of serial killings in the state of Maine.  According to a web site called Fortune City, http://www.fortunecity.com/roswell/streiber/273/inf_stats.htm, 84% of American killers are Caucasian and 16% are black. 

 

Not long ago, FBI profilers identified those who committed senseless random multiple murders as being white males, most likely middle-aged, living at home with a dominant mother.  In recent years, the FBI profile for serial killers now includes a greater number of individuals of color, including women. 

 

The case of Anthony Sowell, a serial killer who murdered at least 11 women in Cleveland, indicates growing numbers of black men involved in mass murder.  However, Sowell seemingly killed at will in Cleveland, but questions must be raised regarding why the media and authorities did not make public a rash of African-American women who were reported missing in Ohio's largest city.  Imagine, if there were cases of women missing in Beverly Hills, California or an affluent area of Long Island, New York or Chicago's famous Gold Coast.  It's safe to say, any of these areas--populated by wealthy mostly white residents--would have received national attention from the press and local, state and federal authorities would have put together task forces to investigate these crimes, in order bring the killer to justice. 

 

Sowell was murdering African-American women for years with impunity.  Indeed, reports made to the Cleveland Police Dept. regarding a foul smell emanating in the area of Sowell's home for months were dismissed and attributed to a rendering plant which processed head cheese.  The truth is those familiar with the smell of decaying human remains say there is nothing else like it.  Those who made reports to the Cleveland Police, who lived in the area, were either former members of law enforcement or the military who say the odor of human death is something they will never forget or mistake for something other than what it is. 

 

The question that begs to be answered is:  Why was the rash of missing African-American women in Cleveland not reported to the press by authorities?  Obviously, there was a serial killer on the loose.  Yet it took a report from a black woman who was raped by Sowell--a noted sex offender and convicted rapist--to draw attention to the alleged mass murderer.  The woman escaped death, but many did not,  before police officials seriously looked into what had taken place in what can truly be called a Chamber of Horrors. 

 

Tonight, John Allen Muhammad, the "Washington Sniper," another African-American serial killer, is scheduled to be executed in Virginia for killing ten individuals across multiple states.  Muhammad, a convert to Islam, had a juvenile accomplice named Lee Boyd Malvo who escaped the death penalty by becoming a witness for the state and testifying against Muhammad.  Malvo was sentenced to life in prison for his role in the mass killings which terrorized people residing in Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia over a period of months. 

 

One of the first African-American serial killers on record was Wayne Williams who murdered 27 young black boys in Atlanta, Georgia from October 1979 to May 1981.  At the time of Williams arrest, authorities were shocked because the killings were supposedly being committed by a group of white supremacists, possibly associated with the Ku Klux Klan.  The media was certain these murders were racially motivated, but Williams, a black man, is now serving multiple life sentences for his crimes. 

 

Between 1989 and 1990, new ground was broken regarding serial killers when Aileen Carol Wuornos killed at least seven men.  Wuornos, a known prostitute, was eventually executed in October of 2002.  Wuornos' lesbian lover and accomplice, Tyria Moore, assisted in the prosecution of the woman who was then called the "Damsel of Death."  Wuornos was the first known female serial killer in the annals of crime. 

 

More recently, there has been a rash of murders that would not be classified as serial killings, but were equally shocking.  Earlier this year, a Sunday school teacher, Melissa Huckaby, allegedly sexually abused Sandra Cantu, before murdering the eight year old and stuffing her lifeless body into a suitcase.  Cantu's remains were found in a shallow pond mere miles from her home.  Tracy, California police had been concentrating on local registered male sex offenders.  However, the nation was shocked to learn Cantu was most likely killed by a 28 year old woman. 

 

Only weeks ago, a nine year old girl from Missouri was reported missing.  Once more, local authorities were concentrating on registered male sex offenders, only to discover the likely murderer of Elizabeth Olten was a 15 year old minor female who, during questioning by police, admitted to knowing the whereabouts of the young girl's body.  Authorities have charged the minor, whose name has not been released, in the death of Olten.

 

The above stories disprove a number of myths.  It is clear the FBI's profiling handbook must be re-written.  Our society is now producing killers of all races, creeds and genders.  Also, women are proving to be as capable of committing evil acts--which once were the purview of men.  Twenty years ago, the dominant media almost seemed gleeful in reporting that serial killers were predominantly white males.  Today facts indicate this is not the case.  Although white males still make up a significant majority of psychopathic killers, our culture is now cultivating murderers which fit no particular profile or category. 

 

And here's a fact you will definitely not see reported by the dominant press:  Though homosexuals claim to represent 10% of American society (which numbers are highly inflated according to many), 14% of all serial killers worldwide are reported to be homosexual.

 

 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  Dan@rffm.org    

 

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Americans For Truth About Homosexuality Fundraiser Huge Success: Gay Protest Fizzles

RFFM.org Staff Writer

An estimated audience of over 100 pro-family leaders gathered in Arlington Heights on Saturday night, October 24th, in support of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH) www.aftah.org.  The evening featured a speech by Peter LaBarbera, Founder and President of AFTAH, and a nationally recognized activist who has toiled on behalf of pro-family issues for more than two decades.

The keynote speaker was J. Matt Barber, AFTAH Board Member: Director of Cultural Affairs, Liberty Counsel; Associate Dean, Liberty University School of Law; and author of "The Right Hook: From the Ring to the Culture War."

Paul B. Madore, Founder and Director, Maine Grassroots Coalition; Jim Finnegan, President, Choose Life Illinois; and Pete Lines who overcame the homosexual lifestyle also addressed those gathered at the Christian Liberty Academy.

LaBarbera told RFFM.org the night was a huge success and he expressed his appreciation to those gathered and to Pastor Calvin Lindstrom, Church of Christian Liberty and Christian Liberty Academy who delivered the invocation.

Jack Roeser, a well-known pro-family philanthropist who attended the banquet, wowed those in attendance when he offered a $10,000 matching grant for AFTAH.

An expected protest by radical homosexual activists took place outside Christian Liberty Academy which included approximately fifteen demonstrators.  The protest was in response to a national call to action from homosexual leaders. 

"I expected to be meet by a huge phalanx of pro-homosexual demonstrators," said Dan Zanoza, RFFM.org's Executive Director and an attendee of the AFTAH fundraiser.  "The pro-homosexual group blocked our access to the crosswalk leading to the banquet hall.  As a blind individual, I was struck by the insensitivity of a group which calls for tolerance and recognition of what they claim are special rights homosexuals should receive under the U.S. Constitution."

"Thankfully, two members of the Arlington Heights Police Department cleared a path for me and those I came with and that was deeply appreciated on my part," continued Zanoza.  "As I attempted to enter the crosswalk leading to the Academy itself, the pro-homosexual group proceeded to loudly chant their message which greatly increased the danger for myself and others, including the elderly, who depend not only on sight and sound to cross a street.  The insensitivity demonstrated by the group was ironic."

David Smith, Executive Director of the Illinois Family Institute accepted an award on behalf of Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman of the American Family Association (AFA).   

Though the AFTAH banquet was not a political event, two candidates seeking statewide office were present.  Dan Proft, who is running for Governor in the GOP primary and Andy Martin, who is seeking the Republican Party nomination in the U.S. Senate race, joined pro-family supporters at the AFTAH fundraiser.

"I was very impressed with the gathering of people who are concerned about this issue, especially with the words of Mr. Lines, an individual who found his way out of the homosexual lifestyle with God's help," said Arlene Sawicki of South Barrington, a longtime pro-life/pro-family activist.  "Contrary to the sentiments of radical homosexual activists, the entire evening approached the issue of homosexuality and its impact on our culture in a loving, Christlike manner."

A Question and Answer session with Matt Barber and Pete Lines topped off the proceedings.

"I learned a great deal about the negative impact the homosexual lifestyle has upon our culture and individuals who find themselves trapped in this lifestyle," said one of those gathered.  "It is a sad story, but Mr. Lines is proof that there is hope for all who are living their lives contrary to Biblical teachings.  However, it is also a message of hope for those with other addictions because I believe, as one of the speakers noted tonight, homosexuality is a form of sexual addiction that one can overcome."

For information regarding contributions to AFTAH go to:  www.americansfortruth.com/donate/.

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  Dan@rffm.org.   

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Pornography, Sexual Predation: Women Fall Prey To Radical Feminism's Dark Agenda

Commentary by Daniel T. Zanoza  *

Well, they wanted it all and they got it all. Since the 1960's, radical feminists have been telling American women they needed to be more like men. Women were told they needed to be sexually liberated, like men. Women were told they could raise a family on their own, have a career and, basically, have it all, like men.

The sad result of this mantra has led to some societal ills that will probably never be reversed. "No fault divorce" has vastly increased the number of single-parent households which has led to a multitude of children who, essentially, raise themselves.

At the same time, sexual promiscuity and violent crime has gone up exponentially among women.

But perhaps the most telling result of the feminist plan to re-engineer American society can be found in statistics which reveal many more women are now addicted to pornography than in years past. Also, the recent rash of female school teachers having sexual relationships with school children has reached epidemic proportions. Stories of educators having inappropriate sexual contact with children as young as 11 years old now fill the news. It is a sad sign of the times which illustrates a culture without boundaries.

In the past, there were male teachers who had sex with under-aged female students. America looked upon these individuals with disgust and shame--and well they should. These teachers violated their holy trust with their students and society. However, the heavy coverage of Mary Kay Letourneau's illicit affair with an under-aged boy, plus her subsequent prosecution and jailing, gave credence to the fact some women were having problems controlling their sexual appetites. Such stories, unfortunately, have now become commonplace.

Pamela Smart, another so-called educator, went even further to fulfill her lustful urges and greed. Mrs. Smart seduced and employed three of her students with the ultimate result ending in the brutal death of her husband at the hands of her teen-aged lover and friends. America was shocked. It seemed there was a plague infecting those who are trusted with the country's most precious commodity, its children.

More recently, a case in Texas has a former beauty queen turned teacher having an affair with an 18 year old high school student. Shockingly, there are those in the media and elsewhere who claim the relationship was legitimate because an 18 year old is considered an adult. This flies in the face of common sense which says a teacher of any sex should not take advantage of the teacher/student relationship to satisfy sexual desires. There are a myriad of reasons such behavior should be taboo. For example, can a teacher of any sex intimidate one of their charges into having intercourse, in order to get a better grade? To say such unions are between consenting adults is ridiculous.

Fortunately, Texas applies a common sense attitude in state law and defines such violations as criminal, second-class felonies punishable by up to twenty years of imprisonment. Making the situation worse, in many cases, is the double-standard being applied to women who molest their students. If it were men having sex with 12 year old girls, there would be no question over the course of action needed to be taken by the criminal justice system. Yet, somehow, women, in too many cases, have been given a pass regarding such abhorrent behavior.

The question is: Are radical feminists, like Gloria Steinem, proud of this new paradigm? Women are now more violent, participating in crimes only rarely seen as little as 30 years ago. Women now purchase and enjoy pornography in staggering numbers. However, with this new sexual freedom comes the societal ills such moral decay generates.

Beginning in the 60's, groups like the National Organization for Women (NOW) criticized American society for objectifying women. However, from fashion to movies, women are portrayed as sexual objects like never before. Some plastic surgeons make their entire careers solely by performing breast implant surgery. The entertainment industry earns billions of dollars related to pornography from sales over the Internet and DVD's. Smut movies are now mainstream. In the past, X-rated shops on darkened streets sold such material to those who purchased the material, sometimes in disguise. Today, pornography streams into some of the most reputable 5 star hotels. It also can be seen in the privacy of one's own home by simply subscribing to certain cable channels.

Yes, women have become sexual objects like never before. Yet where is the outcry from radical feminists?

The outcry is not there because if feminists attacked pornography and its impact on American culture, these feminists would have to admit they had it wrong in the first place. Their assault on the country's sexual mores of yesteryear has resulted in the total devaluation and objectification of women in today's culture. "Girls Gone Wild" video sales have made pornographers wealthy and individuals like Larry Flynt of Hustler magazine fame are now considered heroes in the defense of free speech and First Amendment rights.

Yes, radical feminists have accomplished a great deal in less than 50 years. Women now become strippers to, supposedly, work their way through college. Some little girls say they want to follow in the footsteps of Madonna and Brittany Spears. To all those feminists who believed the Judeo-Christian morality of years past was repressive, America salutes you. So stand up and take the credit--or blame--for where your work has led many women.

 *  The above column originally appeared on IllinoisFamilyInstitute.org June 22, 2006: 
http://www.illinoisfamily.org/news/contentview.asp?c=32897 

Related column: Sandra Cantu and the Plague of Murdered Children: Result of Abortion, Pornography & Liberal Agenda:  http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2009/04/sandra-cantu-and-the-plague-of-murdered-children-result-of-abortion-pornography-a-liberal-society-.html

RFFM.org will be addressing these issues and more in the near future.  RFFM.org urges those who would like to provide data and commentary on this tragic epidemic of child predation to contact Dan@rffm.org. 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact Dan@rffm.org.

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Sandra Cantu and the Plague of Murdered Children: Result of Abortion, Pornography & Liberal Agenda

RFFM.org Commentary by Daniel T. Zanoza

It was horrific.  A surveillance tape pictured eight year old Sandra Cantu gleefully skipping away from her home in Tracy, California.  Sandra's destination was mere yards down the block to play with a young friend.  The video was the last image of Sandra alive before she was brutally murdered, stuffed into a suit case and eventually dumped into a drainage pond where she was left in a temporary, watery grave.

 

The alleged murderer, Melissa Huckaby, a 28 year old Sunday school teacher and mother of the slain child's best friend, was the last individual Sandra Cantu saw on that fateful day and we can only imagine the horror this innocent child of God experienced during her final moments on Earth.

 

What makes little Sandra's death even more hard to fathom is the fact her killer was a woman.  This fact flies in the face of FBI statistics which indicate most sexual predators and child killers are men.  However, data from law enforcement is telling us more and more women are participating in such terrible crimes. 

Robert Himmelblau, the Deputy District Attorney from San Joaquin County, stated a homicide charge against Huckaby could also include the special circumstances of rape with a foreign object, lewd and lascivious conduct with a child and murder in the course of a kidnapping.

It is time to identify the reasons why mankind's most precious commodity has become the prey of deviant individuals.  The facts behind what seems to be an epidemic of missing, sexually abused and murdered children may be politically incorrect.  Yet the facts speak for themselves and the carnage goes on and on.

 

ABORTION

 

In a legally-flawed decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, the case of Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in America.  That ruling has had a profound impact on our nation's society and culture.  The obvious negative impact of the high court's ruling is the murder of over 50 million innocent unborn to date.  The deaths resulting from Roe v. Wade were the direct intent of the law.  However, the subsequent effect--the sanctioned taking of human life--has been far-reaching in many ways.

 

The legalization of abortion, essentially, relegated human life into a commodity with no value.  Women were given the authority by the court to diminish the worth of babies in the womb under the imagined premise of privacy rights.

 

It is a fait accompli that this newfound "right" to "choose" who has the right to live or die would be extended beyond the womb.  Indeed, the barbaric procedure called partial-birth abortion is a clear demonstration of this reality.  This form of abortion has led the nation down a slippery slope which has resulted in a dangerous world for children.  In fact, a Princeton University professor believes parents have the "moral right" to kill their children after their birth.  Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics at the prestigious institution has set a timeline which would allow a child to be vulnerable to the life and death whims of a parent.  Singer feels people with severe disabilities and children up to one month of age should be allowed to be put to death.  Like Hitler, Singer seeks "more from the fit and less from the unfit," a philosophy also advanced by individuals like Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, the leading abortion provider in America.

 

Sadly, these philosophies have bled over into America's mainstream culture.  It is apparent many dysfunctional adults see children as mere commodities.  The FBI reports those most likely to subject a child to sexual abuse, in many cases for profit, are biological parents.  Though abuse of children clearly took place before the legalization of abortion, the liberalization of American society and numerous mitigating factors have led to what has become open season on an entire generation.

 

Abortion's role in this growing epidemic of sexual abuse and murder cannot be denied.  In addition, as desired by the feminist movement--the primary advocates of abortion--women are now equal to men and some have joined the unholy ranks of child predators.  The rash of cases involving school teachers--who now see ten year olds as sexual objects--is a clear indication of the deviance wrought by progressives who believe "if it feels good, just do it."

 

Abortion has changed the way children are looked upon in the United States and in many parts of the world.  In a way, the practice has dehumanized children where they are now viewed as mere possessions, subject to disposal.  There have been times in human history when children were perceived in this manner and those cultures self-destructed or are the bastions of human degradation, like China.  The exact number of those aborted since 1973 is unclear and so is the exact number of children who have become victims of the philosophy related to the procedure.  But those numbers and children are real.

 

PORNOGRAPHY & THE INTERNET

 

Before he was put to death by the state of Florida, serial killer Ted Bundy--who may have murdered hundreds of women--told anyone who would listen pornography played a significant role in his monstrous behavior.

 

Today, it is safe to say millions of Americans of all ages are addicted to porn.  But, sadly, it is the youth of America who, according to statistics, are viewing explicit sexual material via the Internet in ever-increasing numbers.  Psychologists point out the addiction to pornography by adolescent and pre-adolescent youth may be the leading factor in sexual predation in later years.

 

Clinical studies indicate the viewing of such material by individuals who do not have the ability to separate reality from fantasy can play an important part in the explosion of sexually-motivated assaults.  In layman's terms, men--and an increasing number of women--are acting out their fantasies in the real world.  This fact  may be playing a crucial role in the attacks on children, according to many experts.  Children do not have the psychological tools necessary to deal with the deluge of graphic sexual images which are available on the Internet and draw them like moths to a flame.

 

Perhaps the reason children are often the victims of sexual assault is because they are easy targets.  Individuals who are addicted to pornography, in some cases, act out on their fantasies with children because children are easy targets.  Sexual predators often have not developed social skills which allow them to interact with other adults.  Subsequently, these offenders choose the most vulnerable as targets for their unfilled sexual frustrations.

 

Those who are addicted to Internet pornography are hidden from view.  For the most part, these individuals participate in their addiction behind closed doors.  Unfortunately, some fulfill their prurient needs in public libraries.  There have been a number of cases where children have been solicited in libraries with one physical attack occurring in what should be a place of safety for young people.

 

The horror stories behind sexual content on the Internet and an entire generation growing up with this technology is yet to be told.  However, not everyone who views pornography will become a sexual predator or a killer.  But even the smallest percentage of those who lack psychological restraints and act out on their fantasies can be devastating for their victims and our society on the whole.

 

LIBERAL AGENDA

 

There are other components which assuredly have played a role in what has become an epidemic regarding the sexual predation of America's children.  Single-parent households; the assault on traditional marriage as an institution; no-fault divorce; children born out of wedlock; sexual imagery in television, movies and music; and what some believe is the premature exposure to sex education in public schools--this represent the tip of the iceberg which individually may be benign, but cumulatively may have a devastating impact on our culture.

 

Some times, children are participating in this epidemic themselves, evident in the phenomenon of "Sexting" where young people are using computers and cell phones to send sexual material to their friends.  In many cases, this material ends up in the hands of pedophiles.  Unbelievably, the state of Vermont is considering legislation which would legalize such activity among young people over the age of 13 who are in a committed relationship.

 

It is time to put aside political correctness and deal with an issue which has destroyed countless families and communities since the sexual revolution of the 1960's which changed America for forty years running.  Amazingly, some say the sexual liberation of a repressed society has been worth the cost.  It is a certainty the parents of little Sandra Cantu would not agree.

 

 

RFFM.org will be addressing these issues and more in the near future.  RFFM.org urges those who would like to provide data and commentary on this tragic epidemic of child predation to contact Dan@rffm.org.  

 

Related column:  Pornography, Sexual Predation: Women Fall Prey To Radical Feminism's Dark Path
http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2009/04/pornography-sexual-predation-women-fall-prey-to-radical-feminisms-dark-path.html

 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact Dan@rffm.org.

 

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Those Who Voted For Obama (Mexico City Policy, FOCA) Have Blood Of Unborn On Their Hands

by Daniel T. Zanoza, Executive Director

My wife was getting her hair cut just weeks before the presidential election.  The stylist--who suddenly was an expert on Barack Obama and John McCain--was providing a lecture on the abortion policy of the two men.

"John McCain used to be pro-abortion," said the hair-stylist-turned-political-gadfly.  "That's a fact.  McCain has flip-flopped on the position of abortion.  Once he was for it, now he's not."

My wife spent most of her time listening because she knew it was no use arguing with the woman.  I might have done the same if someone was holding a sharp pair of scissors close to my neck, too.

Obviously, the woman had made up her mind.  She was going to vote for then-Senator Barack Obama, but she had to come up with reasons why--especially in a small town in central Illinois where it's not unusual to see Republicans run unopposed for elected office.  I guess it was right about then that I realized John McCain was in trouble.  The Arizona Senator had taken the pro-family, pro-life vote for granted and the Obama campaign filled the void very well thank you.  McCain only mentioned the abortion issue once in three political debates with the junior senator from Illinois.  So people like the hair stylist filled in the blanks any way they wanted to regarding the issue of abortion.

Americans have a way of trying to make themselves feel better about the choices they make.  In the past, the saying was "I don't want to get involved."  Today the opposite is true.  Everyone wants to get involved, even if they don't understand the consequence of their action.

"Barack Obama's election will be historic," said school teachers, liberal columnists and African-American leaders--including the clergy.  However, few seemed to know (or care) what Obama believed in.  Well, those people are starting to learn and there are consequences for their ignorance.

On Friday, Obama signed an executive order ending the ban on federal funding for international groups that promote or perform abortions. 

Known as the Mexico City Policy, established in 1984 by President Ronald Reagan, the executive order was rescinded by President Bill Clinton and then reinstated by George W. Bush and once more rescinded by Barack Obama.  The bottom line is American tax dollars will once more help kill unborn babies worldwide.

Now if you voted for Barack Obama and this makes you uncomfortable, perhaps you shouldn't read on.  The truth is one of Obama's campaign pledges included a promise to sign a bill called the Freedom Of Choice Act (FOCA).  FOCA would turn the United States into a virtual "free fire zone" on unborn children and those who protect them.  Legislation, including parental notification, the ban on partial-birth abortion and the ban on live-birth abortion would be things of the past.  Doctors and hospitals which refused to take the life of innocent unborn children would no longer be entitled to federal money.  Pharmacies and pharmacists would be forced to dispense controversial abortifacients without recourse.  The list goes on and on.

Yes, FOCA would be an abortionist's dream.  It would be akin to when Adolf Hitler legalized the murder of Jews.  FOCA, like the Holocaust, will become government-sanctioned policy, if Obama has his way.  And those who voted for him can take credit or blame for a bill that will lead to the deaths of millions if enacted.

I suppose, like in Nazi Germany, there will be those who will claim they didn't understand Obama's stand on abortion.  Or they might try to find sanctuary in the fact this is only one bill the President will sign--among thousands--in the next four years.  However, none of these excuses hold water.  If you didn't know where the man stood on the issue, it wasn't hard to find out.  Clearly, I am quite comfortable in saying the blood of the unborn will stain the hands of those who voted for this man.  And, no matter how hard they try to wash it off, it will remain.

Of course, there are higher powers that can offer forgiveness.  But collectively, as a culture, such ignorance is unforgivable.  Subsequently, I hope that nice warm glow some of you felt when Obama was being sworn in will cover the shame we should all feel for electing such a man to the American presidency, a man who should understand what it is when an entire group is stripped of its humanity.

There have been an estimated 50 million abortions committed in the United States since the landmark Supreme Court decision titled Roe v. Wade went into effect in 1973.  Those numbers will increase dramatically under the Obama presidency.  And let's make sure responsibility lies where it is due.

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  Dan@rffm.org

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Obama's Inauguration: Change: From Self-Reliance to Dependence, From Leadership to Subservience and more

by Daniel T. Zanoza, Executive Director

For the first time in my adult memory, I did not watch the inauguration of a new president.  I'm sorry, but I find no reason to celebrate what may be the end of America as we know it.

At noon Eastern time, Barack Obama was sworn into office.  Some claim it was an historic moment.  I refuse to acknowledge the fact Obama's skin color should play a major role in our celebration.  Race is openly being used to bolster the worth of a man which is something we have been taught to reject during the last 40 years, haven't we?

The truth of the matter is Barack Obama is not the first African-American president.  He is the first President of mixed race.  But when studied closely, the labeling of Obama as a black man apparently will fit in well with his agenda for our nation.

During the Clinton administration, welfare reform was enacted to the anguish of many African-American leaders.  Mr. Clinton, who, too was called America's "first black president" was criticized from pillar to post for signing the welfare reform bill.  Individuals like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton derive power from those who are dependent on government and this new legislation promised to reduce their influence on a substantial segment of American society.

The truth of the matter is welfare reform has been a staggering success.  I recently spoke with a member of middle management with the Illinois Dept. of Human Services.  He told me welfare reform had literally freed up millions of those who were formerly dependent on a welfare check to now truly be able to seek their human potential.  This was not a political pitch I was hearing because this DHS official would benefit from more Illinois residents being on the welfare rolls.  You see, the more people dependent on his office, the more power he has.  It's a simple equation that many have manipulated for their own benefit over the past 80 years.  Beginning with Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal and ending with the disastrous legacy of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society, an entire people had been relegated to a legalized form of slavery which was hidden under the guise of welfare.

Black men were told to stay away from their families or their children would suffer the loss of benefits.  Poor white and African-American women were encouraged to have as many children as possible out of wedlock.  The more children, the more money a family received.  It was a vicious circle of poverty and dependence.

Barack Obama is about to revisit this plague upon our nation.  Under what he calls a stimulus package, Americans who do not work will be given tax refunds.  We are about to see an entire generation rekindle its dependence upon government as the answer to its problems.  Obama has the audacity to admit this is his strategy.  In a speech just days before his inauguration, the 44th President of the United States said government is the only thing that will save America.

Sadly, some Republicans have bought into this lie.  With amazement, I watched George Bush virtually nationalize the United States banking system.  This was a path the Democratic Party was more than willing to follow.

Against the will of the American people, hundreds of billions of dollars were spent--and will be spent--on the socialization of our country's free market system.  Therefore, I was not happy to see a man sworn in who seems hell bent on making the United States a second rate world power.  I wonder.  Will America survive the Obama presidency?  Or will Obama's idolization of European socialism become the rule of the land for us all?

Obama truly is a man for his times.  He is light without mass.  He receives accolades without accomplishments.  Perhaps in four years this will fit the description of a once powerful and vibrant nation under Obama's leadership.

Contrary to the thoughts of Obama, I believe our country needs prayer, instead of more government.  

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  Dan@rffm.org

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Attacks on RFFM.org Director's Character From a So-called Conservative Nothing But Lies

by Daniel T. Zanoza, Executive Director

On March 18th, 2006, one day after the fourth of what would be five operations on the only eye which gave me partial sight, a doctor removed the final bandage and I was totally blind.  I could not see shadows.  I could not see the doctor's head lamp.  I was totally blind.  In medical terms, I am considered functionally blind and the one certainty I was later to learn was that I would never see my wife's face again.

In the years prior to the complete loss of my sight, I imagined what it would be like to be completely left without sight.  I think most human beings think about this happening to them some time in their life.  Some say they couldn't live without eyesight and, frankly, some can't.  Many people who lose their eyesight after the age of 50 commit suicide.

Thankfully, it was as though I was preparing myself for this day all of my life.  I might say I prepared myself as much as I could because no one could truly anticipate and plan for such a traumatic experience.  In my case, my faith played a major role in dealing with my medical condition.  I also have a loving wife who I knew would be there to stand by me for the rest of our lives together.  Some people are not blessed with such luxuries.  I truly believe my blindness is part of God's plan and it is my duty to use my condition to better myself as a human being and to add something to the world that surrounds me, which I cannot see.

One of the hardest things about any tragedy is how such events impact those who love you.  I can truly say it has been harder for my wife, family and friends to deal with my blindness than it has been for me.  But this is a natural process.  It is part of life and I am truly fortunate that there are those who care so much.  Some times it might be easier if you knew a loved one wasn't going through pain.  However, that is what unconditional love is all about.

I never planned to write a column about this subject.  Those who are physically challenged do not seek sympathy.  In fact, the opposite is true.  I was legally blind for 52 years of my life and even in adulthood one of my major goals was to keep my handicap a secret.  However, I have recently learned an alleged conservative is spreading rumors that I am not completely blind and that I am intentionally trying to deceive my readers by playing on their sympathies.  Imagine that.  This individual is telling people I am only legally blind, as though that condition alone is nothing worth mentioning.  But why would someone spread a lie of this sort?  I believe people who spread malicious gossip are driven by evil, nothing more and nothing less.  I would not be responding to these slanders, if not for the fact I have written a number of columns where I mentioned my blindness--many times in a joking manner. 

The truly sad thing about this situation is that someone feels there is a necessity to build themselves up by trying to attack me.  This is a sad statement about the human condition.  But I have prayed for this individual and so has my wife.

Many believe politics is a dirty game and stories like the one I have told here truly keep the best in our society from seeking elected office.  The lies told about me didn't come from a Democrat, they came from an alleged conservative.  I use the words alleged conservative because most people who consider themselves social conservatives abide by a moral code; not a code set up by man or government, but a code given to us by our Creator.  Individuals who break such standards of decency are not conservatives, they are guns for hire who swim the waters of the political world like sharks in a reef.

If anyone has any questions about the status of my eyesight, they are welcome to come to my home to review my medical records.  Of course, this would be an invasion of my privacy, but sometimes transparency is more important than our personal comfort.  I will keep this individual, who feels it's necessary to lie about me, in my prayers.  I hope one day the Lord will enter their heart. 

I will not reveal the person's name for one reason and one reason only.  This person is working on some projects with people of impeccable character and I wouldn't want collateral damage to impact them.

In the meantime, I will count on those who know me personally and those who know me through my writings to believe I would never bear false witness or lie about my eyesight or any other issue on this web site.  I am not perfect and I have many faults.  In fact, too many to write about here, but two of the greatest compliments my wife and I ever received was when someone said "The Zanoza's must be Christians because of the way they act," and "If the Zanoza's wrote it, it must to be true."  Perhaps those are the greatest compliments anyone can receive.

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact: Dan@rffm.org  

Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected. No hyperlinks allowed.

FOOD, WATER AND ENERGY = CONTROL OF AMERICANS

by Joyce Morrison *

Henry Kissinger was reported to have said, “Control the food and you control the people.” Controlling people is as simple as controlling food, water and energy through a variety of controls.

“No Farmers No Food,” the bumper sticker distributed by The Adopt a Farm Family ministry, is a message of warning. The Adopt ministry was started by Mary Myers, wife of Peter Myers, former Deputy Secretary of Agriculture who served in the Reagan Administration. She confided to me that God had instructed her to “watch over the food.” At that time there appeared to be no reason for concern. Now we see a new pattern unfolding. Could we be watching the beginning of Revelations 6:6?

"Green is the new red, white and blue,” was a recent quote made by a university environmental group. The extreme environmental movement has been compared to a watermelon.” Green on the outside but red on the inside.” Daily we are facing energy and possibly a food crisis because of the extreme environmental control that has swept our nation.

The goal of farmers in the U.S. is to provide the safest, cheapest food in the world…but that privilege is being taken from them one step at a time. We see our rural areas coming under many regulations. Farming acres are turned into open space, heritage areas, wetlands and programs that take crop land out of production.

F. William Engdahl’s latest book, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, “focuses on how a small American elite group seeks to establish control over the very basis of human survival: our daily bread.” Farmers are not geneticists. They plant the seeds they purchase in good faith, but they do not know the full genetic make-up of the seeds they plant.

Not only do grain farmers face problems, but livestock producers are facing a livestock tracking system that would reflect total control of our meat supply. If we permit the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) to be implemented, small producers will be eliminated. It will be virtually impossible for them to meet the requirements.

The official USDA documents can be found on www.farmandranchalliance.org website. NAIS begins with the registration of your premise - which is where your livestock are held. Livestock animals include cattle (beef and dairy), hogs, sheep and goats, chickens and other poultry, horses, bison, deer and elk, alpacas and llamas, and others.

“In a three year period the total NAIS computer movement  numbers in the USA will more than eclipse the number of all people living on the entire planet earth,” according to a report by Darol Dickenson, The enforcement for not reporting within a 24 hour period could be a financial disaster to livestock owners.

The system is promoted by commercial interests such as the Digital Angel/Veri-chip corporation who have a patented implantable microchip for tracking RFID tags and GPS identification. They are already using chips in some hospitals and plans are underway by these same companies to chip the public at large. Could this be so people can “buy and sell” as stated in Revelations 13:16?

While USDA says this is a “voluntary” program, 4-H and FFA members in Colorado are forced to have a Premise Identification in order to enter their projects at the fairs. Illinois had mandated this same regulation but due to an outcry of the people, they lifted their mandate for 2008.

Merck/Schering-Plough Pharmaceuticals, maker of VYTORIN (which is now under scrutiny) is listed as a member of the National Institute of Animal Agriculture (NIAA), the driving force behind NAIS. Control and greed appear to be the purpose of this program – not food safety. The CEO of Digital Angel, said, "We continue to support the livestock industry groups and USDA as they implement NAIS for livestock producers on a voluntary basis.”

WATER:

Control the water - control the people. If you have a well on your property, one of the goals of water control is to meter your well. The United Nations considers water to be a “global commons” to be commonly shared with all people.

The Clean Water Restoration Act (HR2421) is very frightening legislation on the federal level. This bill removes the word “navigable” from the Clean Water Act and places every ditch, pond or wet spot – virtually your back yard - under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Corps of Engineers. You will not be permitted to make any changes on your property without approval.

Germany, France and other countries own municipal water works in many locations in the United States. What would happen if one day could our “water was shut off?” Water needed for irrigation was deprived to farmers in the Klamath Basin in Oregon a few years ago causing devastation.

Farmers continue to stand for the belief to provide cheap, safe food for people around the world. They need the consumer’s help to take action when they see unwarranted changes in our food, water and land regulations. The rising cost of food is not because of subsidized farmers. At the current grain prices, farmers do not receive subsidies. In the past, there was speculation of a price control on grains with the purpose of the subsidy being for the benefit of the consumer.

We are definitely living in troubling times as we see our economy being disrupted with foreclosures on homes, soaring energy and food prices and unrest in the Mid-East. There are solutions to our problems such as drilling in ANWR, permitting new refineries and power plants to be built. There are many things we could do to eliminate our dilemma, but the environmentalists appear to be holding our legislators by the pocket.

The truth will never be found at happy hour discussing what was in the newspaper or on CNN. Until the people at large become informed with the truth - and take action, we will find our food, water and energy being used to control the masses.

* Joyce Morrison is a community organizer, activist and expert on property rights.  She operates a farm in southern Illinois.

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact Dan@rffm.org   

 

Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed. 

War Between Social and Fiscal Conservatives: Lack of Compassion Does Hurt the Republican Party

Somehow GOP Needs Face Lift, But Cosmetic Surgery Might Not Be Enough

 

by Daniel T. Zanoza

 

After nearly 15 years of attempting to describe how the mainstream media has often negatively portrayed conservatives, I have found there are some basic truths which have prompted such coverage.  Certainly those who fall on the right of the political spectrum are not fairly represented or reported on by many journalists in the dominant press.  However, the dynamics of conservatism and the varied views which make up this broad political idiom has, at times, fostered the coverage it receives.

 

It must be acknowledged all conservatives do not think alike and are not driven by the same motivations.  In the past, I myself have been critical of  views espoused by some on the right.  For example, fiscal conservatives, seemingly, only care about issues related to the almighty dollar.  In fact, many fiscal conservatives hold liberal views on social matters, including public education and abortion.  Then, there is a category of conservatives who want people to do things their way.  Often, they are highly judgmental and lack reasonable tolerance.  I do not use the word tolerance here in its corrupted form.  Today tolerance connotes the blind acceptance of all types of behavior--no matter how anti-social or morally corrupted.  This group of conservatives I speak of simply cannot tolerate viewpoints which stray from their own and they do not demonstrate the willingness to look at opposing viewpoints.  These conservatives are not willing or able to put themselves in their brother's shoes.

 

The mainstream media has used the opinions espoused by these two groups to label all conservatives as mean-spirited and uncaring.  A third branch of conservatism includes individuals who acknowledge America was primarily founded on Judeo-Christian principles.  Included in this group's thinking are the concepts held within the Judeo-Christian ethic which embrace charity and compassion for one's fellow man.  They hold on to this philosophy because it is required by their faith and, though they do not agree with opinions contrary to their own, at the same time, they demonstrate love for their neighbor.

 

Sadly, during a decade and a half of pro-family advocacy regarding the dominant media, I have found there are many individuals who do not embrace the faith-driven edicts held by this third conservative faction.

 

A perfect example of what I call "conservatism without compassion" was illustrated to me during a recent discussion with a director of a conservative organization.  Purely by happenstance, this individual brought up an issue currently being debated in the federal courts regarding the fact different denominations of U.S. currency cannot be distinguished by the blind and those suffering from dyslexia.  The director of the conservative group suggested I write a column on the subject.  This individual somehow believed I would share the opinion that having access to readable currency for the blind or dyslexic would represent another form of false victimization.

 

Forgive the pun, but I have special insight concerning such matters.  For most of my life, I was legally blind with partial vision.  I could distinguish between different denominations of currency, by bringing the bills very close to my eyes.

 

However, earlier this year, I became what is called functionally blind.  This means I cannot pursue normal life functions without mechanical aids or the assistance of others.  For example, I would walk into a wall without the use of a cane, I could not read a utility bill or any other printed document(s), I would be totally lost if I were placed in an unfamiliar area, etc.  The abilities possessed by unsighted individuals vary.  Those in the military who have recently lost their vision--as casualties of war--would have a much greater problem negotiating their new world than someone who has been blind from birth and trained--at a young age--in the use of functional aids, like Braille.

 

For years, I had been operating on a false assumption.  I mistakenly believed those who were functionally blind identified currency on which physical cues existed.  During a recent rehabilitation session, to my amazement, I learned this was not the case.  The only way for the blind or dyslexic to distinguish one denomination of currency from another is by either arranging bills in sequence, folding bills in differing configurations or depending on the assistance of a friend or loved one or to trust a stranger to be honest.  But, of course, from the beginning, every blind or dyslexic person has to depend on the honesty of the original dispenser of said funds.  There is no way to get around this fact.  No matter how well a physically challenged human being has mastered the art of self-reliance, the bottom line is:  At one point in time or another, I must rely on the honesty of a complete stranger.

 

The more I thought about this issue, the more I understood my Constitutional rights are indeed being violated by the U.S. Government.  If not for the help of my loving wife, I literally would be unable to live a productive life at this point.

 

But the director of the conservative organization felt I was not entitled to such rights because they were not provided for within the U.S. Constitution.  This individual did not stop there, saying:  Buildings did not need to be accessible to those in wheelchairs, the same goes for street corners which, in the past, prevented wheelchair access and on and on.

 

To my amazement, the individual, who I was quickly losing respect for, asked, "What did people do 200 years ago who were blind or handicapped?"  I was also told, "You could use your credit card to make purchases."  I was stunned and, frankly, I felt personally attacked.  According to this person, because of conditions beyond my control, which have an impact on myself and others, a significant number of Americans do not and should not have the same access to essential goods and services for our livelihood as those without physical handicaps.  Remarkably, this prominent individual in the conservative community apparently does not believe in the Declaration of Independence which states, "...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."

 

The draconian beliefs of this conservative leader reminded me of those advanced by Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, an organization responsible for millions of abortions in America since the 1973 U.S. Supreme Court's ruling titled Roe v. Wade, which legalized the practice.  Sanger's motto was, "More from the fit, less from the unfit."  It was a philosophy later advanced by leaders in Nazi Germany to "dispose" of undesirables, which included the handicapped, among others.

 

The director of the conservative group tried to legitimize the position taken against the court ruling involving access to readable currency for the blind and dyslexic.

 

This individual claimed such legal decisions only helped to create more victims in American society and the courts did not have the right to create such laws.  "Then you would support actions taken to level the playing field for the physically handicapped, if it were strictly done through legislation," I asked.  "Yes," said the conservative "leader"--in a totally unconvincing tone, "but there is no constitutional right to create these kinds of laws."

 

No wonder conservatives often take the brunt of criticism from the dominant media.  If this position were drawn out to its ultimate degree, Blacks would still be considered as three-fifths of a human being and American Indians would not be considered human beings at all.  Liberals say conservatives lack compassion and I would be standing in line with them to agree--if indeed all of us held the views of the person who prompted my writing of this column.

 

I speculate whether this individual would have a different opinion, if circumstances dictated he, she or a loved one had to live their life in a wheelchair or was surrounded by total darkness.  I found that the ideals held within the faith this person claimed to believe in were trumped by conservative political dogma.

 

Years ago, the deaf, blind or those without the ability to walk were institutionalized or, in some cultures, left to die--at an early age.  In my conversation with this individual, who often waxed eloquent about the rights of the unborn, I was hearing nothing about the rights of those who live.

 

If this were the only person who felt this way about such issues, it would be a sad anomaly within the social conservative movement.  Unfortunately, there are far too many others who share similar views and demonstrate the same lack of compassion and mean-spiritedness which the media accuses social conservatives of.

 

Thankfully, a vast majority of those who call themselves social conservatives are compassionate and giving individuals.  I do not contend that everyone who disagrees with me on such issues is a heartless human being.  There is room, or at least there should be room, for honest discussion among conservatives concerning most every issue that does not violate the tenets of the collective viewpoints of the Judeo-Christian faith we embrace.

 

I do not say these things because I am blind.  I have been legally blind all my life and I have never used what God has given me for a crutch or excuse.  I do not use my physical limitations to get special treatment either.  In fact, I stand firmly against affirmative action--especially concerning the use of quotas or set-asides.  To the contrary, most people with physical or emotional handicaps try their best to be unobtrusive on our society.  We wish to be productive American citizens, although it is sad to report out of the three per cent of all Americans who are either legally blind or functionally blind, 70% are unemployed.

 

I wrote this column because I believe my faith tells me I should treat others as I would like to be treated.

 

Perhaps some of us need to search our hearts to see if we really are truly compassionate conservatives.  And, if we demonstrate that we are, just maybe our message regarding other issues would be more readily accepted or, at the very least, understood by others, including the media.  What a wonderful political ideology that would be.

 

This column originally appeared December 6, 2006.

 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact Dan@rffm.org   

Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Feminists Have Their Way: Some Women Now Sexual Predators

by Daniel T. Zanoza

FROM THE ARCHIVES  --  JUNE 17, 2006

Well, they wanted it all and they got it all.  Since the 1960's, radical feminists have been telling American women they needed to be more like men.  Women were told they needed to be sexually liberated, like men.  Women were told they could raise a family on their own, have a career and, basically, have it all, like men.
 
The sad result of this mantra has led to some societal ills that will probably never be reversed.  "No fault divorce" has vastly increased the number of single-parent households which has led to a multitude of children who, essentially, raise themselves.
 
At the same time, sexual promiscuity and violent crime has gone up exponentially among women.
 
But perhaps the most telling result of the feminist plan to re-engineer American society can be found in statistics which reveal many more women are now addicted to pornography than in years past.  Also, the recent rash of female school teachers having sexual relationships with school children has reached epidemic proportions.  Stories of educators having inappropriate sexual contact with children as young as 11 years old now fill the news.  It is a sad sign of the times which illustrates a culture without boundaries.
 
 Mary Kay Letourneau
 
In the past, there were male teachers who had sex with under-aged female students.  America looked upon these individuals with disgust and shame--and well they should.  These teachers violated their holy trust with their students and society.  However, the heavy coverage of Mary Kay Letourneau's illicit affair with an under-aged boy, plus her subsequent prosecution and jailing, gave credence to the fact some women were having problems controlling their sexual appetites.  Such stories, unfortunately, have now become commonplace.
 
 Pamela Smart
 
Pamela Smart, another so-called educator, went even further to fulfill her lustful urges and greed.  Mrs. Smart seduced and employed three of her students with the ultimate result ending in the brutal death of her husband at the hands of her teen-aged lover and friends.  America was shocked.  It seemed there was a plague infecting those who are trusted with the country's most precious commodity, its children.
 
More recently, a case in Texas has a former beauty queen turned teacher having an affair with an 18 year old high school student.  Shockingly, there are those in the media and elsewhere who claim the relationship was legitimate because an 18 year old is considered an adult.  This flies in the face of common sense which says a teacher of any sex should not take advantage of the teacher/student relationship to satisfy sexual desires.  There are a myriad of reasons such behavior should be taboo.  For example, can a teacher of any sex intimidate one of their charges into having intercourse, in order to get a better grade?  To say such unions are between consenting adults is ridiculous.
 
Fortunately, Texas applies a common sense attitude in state law and defines such violations as criminal, second-class felonies punishable by up to twenty years of imprisonment.  Making the situation worse, in many cases, is the double-standard being applied to women who molest their students.  If it were men having sex with 12 year old girls, there would be no question over the course of action needed to be taken by the criminal justice system.  Yet, somehow, women, in too many cases, have been given a pass regarding such abhorrent behavior.
 
Gloria Steinem
 
The question is:  Are radical feminists, like Gloria Steinem, proud of this new paradigm?  Women are now more violent, participating in crimes only rarely seen as little as 30 years ago.  Women now purchase and enjoy pornography in staggering numbers.  However, with this new sexual freedom comes the societal ills such moral decay generates.
 
Beginning in the 60's, groups like the National Organization for Women (NOW) criticized American society for objectifying women.  However, from fashion to movies, women are portrayed as sexual objects like never before.  Some plastic surgeons make their entire careers solely by performing breast implant surgery.  The entertainment industry earns billions of dollars related to pornography from sales over the Internet and DVD's.  Smut movies are now mainstream.  In the past, X-rated shops on darkened streets sold such material to those who purchased the material, sometimes in disguise.  Today, pornography streams into some of the most reputable 5 star hotels.  It also can be seen in the privacy of one's own home by simply subscribing to certain cable channels.
 
Yes, women have become sexual objects like never before.  Yet where is the outcry from radical feminists?
 
The outcry is not there because if feminists attacked pornography and its impact on American culture, these feminists would have to admit they had it wrong in the first place.  Their assault on the country's sexual morés of yesteryear has resulted in the total devaluation and objectification of women in today's culture.  "Girls Gone Wild" video sales have made pornographers wealthy and individuals like Larry Flynt of Hustler magazine fame are now considered heroes in the defense of free speech and First Amendment rights.
 
Yes, radical feminists have accomplished a great deal in less than 50 years.  Women now become strippers to, supposedly, work their way through college.  Some little girls say they want to follow in the footsteps of Madonna and Brittany Spears.  To all those feminists who believed the Judeo-Christian morality of years past was repressive, America salutes you.  So stand up and take the credit--or blame--for where your work has led many women.

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact Dan@rffm.org   

Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.