RFFM.ORG

Nativity Scene Returns to IL State Capitol for 4th year

4th Annual Springfield Nativity Scene Returns to IL Capitol Rotunda

On Tuesday, November 29th, 2011, the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee (SNSC) will hold its fourth annual “opening day” ceremony from 11:30 a.m. to 1p.m. in the Illinois State Capitol Rotunda, 301 S. 2nd St., Springfield, IL (corner of 2nd St. and Capitol Ave.), where their privately sponsored and funded Nativity Scene will be put on display for the 4th straight year, right next to the Governor’s “holiday tree.” Musicians and singers from iWorship Center in Springfield will be featured. The event is open to the public.

 

Most Rev. Thomas Paprocki, Bishop of Springfield’s Roman Catholic Diocese, will address those gathered in the Rotunda to celebrate and bear renewed witness to the birth of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

 

Tom Brejcha, Esq., president and chief counsel of the Chicago-based Thomas More Society, a member of the SNSC and its legal counsel, will briefly explain the constitutional rights of private citizens to erect Nativity Scenes as a form of free speech and free exercise of religion in America’s “public square”. Other SNSC members scheduled to speak include Beth Rogers of Springfield, pro-family activist; Dave Smith, Executive Director of the Illinois Family Institute; and Arlene Sawicki, a pro-family activist from South Barrington.

 

The SNSC is encouraging those who would like to sing Christmas carols in the Illinois State Capitol Rotunda at the site of the Nativity Scene to contact Salli Chernis at the Secretary of State’s office, Dept. of Special Events at (217) 782-8996 for permission to do so. Choirs and/or groups may perform on weekdays from 12 noon until 1 p.m. The Thomas More Society will provide free legal help, if any is needed, at (312) 782-1680, to any individual or group of private citizens interested in putting up a similar Nativity Scene – privately sponsored and funded – in any “traditional public forum” in their own town, village or hamlet in Illinois or elsewhere, whether it’s for this year (if time permits) or for next year.

 

“To our knowledge, Illinois is the only state in the country to celebrate the birth of Jesus with a Nativity Scene in a State Capitol Building,” said Julie Zanoza, the new chair of the SNSC who took over the role this year after her husband, Daniel T. Zanoza, founder and first chairman of the Springfield (IL) Nativity Scene Committee, was born into Eternity on January 6th, 2011. “Dan always said ‘this Nativity Scene will stand in the Illinois State Capitol Rotunda long after we (SNSC) are gone to our Heavenly reward’.” The crèche display, consisting of marble-like figures of the Baby Jesus, Mary and, Joseph, will be on view in the Rotunda throughout the Christmas Season.

 

For more info contact [email protected]

or call the Thomas More Society at 312-782-1680

 

Springfield Nativity Scene Committee Members:
Thomas Brejcha, Esq., Chicago-based Thomas More Society
Karl Fritz, Chicago
Pastor Dustin Fulton, Lincoln
Daniel J. Gura, Lake Zurich
State Senator Chris Lauzen, Aurora (acting as a private citizen)
Rev. Bernie Lutchman, Business Men In Christ, Springfield
Sr. Christine M. Moskal, C.R., Chicago-based Thomas More Society
Beth Rogers, Springfield
Arlene Sawicki, South Barrington
David E. Smith, Illinois Family Institute, Carol Stream
Helene S. Zanoza-Stacey, Lincoln
Julie Zanoza, Chair, Lincoln

Dan Zanoza, Born into Eternity on January 6, 2011

 

In honor of my beloved husband, Danny

By Julie Cleary Zanoza

Daniel T. Zanoza

Born into Life on November 27, 1953 in Chicago, Illinois

Born into Eternity on January 6, 2011

A special Mass will be held at St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church on Saturday, February 19, 2011 at 10:00 A.M. to celebrate Dan’s life.  The church is located at 15050 Wolf Road in Orland Park, Illinois.

A service was held in Lincoln, Illinois at Jefferson Street Christian Church (our church) last Saturday, February 5th, 2011.

Danny and I have been together since our first date on February 8, 1974.  We were married at the Four Square Gospel Church in Chicago Ridge on November 20, 1982.  And yes, if you do the math, we went out for over eight years before we got married.  But once we realized we were living in sin, I moved out ‘til we got married.  Dan said his only regret is that we did not get married sooner.  By the way, his best man asked what his duties were and we said one is to decorate the car.  People always would ask us, “when are you two going to get married?”, So I told Jimmy, his best man, you should put “Finally Married” – instead of “Just Married” and that’s what the sign read!  

Feb. 8, 2011 marks the anniversary of our first date 37 years ago.  Quite honestly, I was feeling so sad, I was sobbing...but not for long because two awesome things happened today!  Which I'll get to.

I believe Dan's most important project was coordinating a Nativity Scene in the Illinois State Capitol Rotunda (where our elected officials meet).  Last year was the THIRD consecutive year the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee, Chaired by Dan Zanoza, erected and displayed a Nativity Scene (the only one to stand in a state capitol in the country) honoring the celebration of the birth of our Savior, Jesus Christ.  Dan said, on more than one occasion, that the Springfield Nativity Scene would stand long after we were all gone to our reward in Heaven. 

Therefore, in honor of Dan Zanoza, my beloved husband and best friend, today on the 37th anniversary of our first date, I called the Secretary of State's office (who issues permits for the SNSC) this morning, shortly after they opened, first to thank Salli Chernis for her call and condolence card, but she was not in, a co-worker (Gabby) told me Salli's brother-in-law had passed away.  But I requested an application for a permit to erect the FOURTH annual Nativity Scene for 2011 and it's in the mail now! 

By the way, Jim Finnegan was the person who urged Dan to get a Nativity Scene in the state capitol when we moved to Lincoln.  Jim is connected with the "God Squad" which is responsible for the life-sized Nativity Scene which goes on display each year in downtown Chicago in the Daley Civic Center Plaza.

Illinois State Senator Chris Lauzen of Aurora, a pro-life warrior and a very humble, Godly man introduced Senate Resolution 34 today in the Illinois State Senate to honor Dan’s life and work!  When we spoke last week, Sen. Lauzen had told me he had planned to introduce the resolution at that time, but the legislators were not in session last week because of the blizzard.  Dan is probably shaking his head in Heaven right now, saying, “Why the big deal?  I only did what the Lord led me to do.  My ministry was to serve the Lord and if I saved just one child’s life from an abortionist, my life was worthwhile.”

I am so happy that these two "things" happened on the date of the 37th anniversary of our first date!  Again, I was feeling extremely sad today...but now I'm not!  Praise God!  He lifted my spirits.  February 8th will never be a sad day for me, but a joyous one! 

Incidentally, Sen. Lauzen is a member of the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee (SNSC).  And thanks to Tom Brejcha of the Chicago-based Thomas More Society (TMS) Pro-Life Law Center the Nativity scene became a reality in 2008.  Tom Brejcha is also the SNSC's legal counsel.

Danny was a pro-life warrior for almost two decades.  He considered his work a ministry, including writing for RFFM.org (as its founder and director) and other organizations, including the Illinois Family Institute, Illinois Leader, City News USA, and CleanTV.com.  His writings have been posted on Canada Free Press, many newspapers, magazines, Ann Coulter's blog, Greta Van Susteren's blog, etc.  A college text book even printed an example of Dan's work, well, technically, to be totally accurate, I should say Dan's writings with the Lord's help...which included Christlike messages.

Danny and I always prayed before writing, he never had training as a journalist, but he didn't need training, Dan had God to help him!  And whenever he received a compliment on one of his articles or columns, he would always say, “Thank you, but all the credit and glory goes to the Lord.” 

Danny was not perfect.  In fact, many times he said, “I’m not perfect, far from it; the only perfect person was JESUS”.  Can I get an AMEN?  AMEN!!!  

Dan also would say “God answers our prayers in one of four ways:  Yes, No, Not Now or Not your way.”  The obvious implication for the latter (Not your way) is the Lord has better solutions than we as humans (made in His likeness) to our “problems”. 

Those of you who knew Danny personally, knew he liked to joke around…when appropriate.    He’d be the first to admit he was not good at telling a joke, but he still liked kidding around.

Many of you know Dan became totally blind in 2006.  Yet this did not slow him down as far as his ministry.  There were times he would write a column--after he became totally blind--on paper, for me to type and edit later…because he had so much to say on issues of religious freedom, gun rights and more.  I couldn't keep up with him!

I have to confess, I am NOT a good housekeeper, far from it, and, obviously, out of necessity, since I could only cook breakfast items or something simple, like a grilled cheese sandwich or hamburger, Dan taught me how to cook.  The reason I mention this is because Dan as a totally blind person (with not even light recognition) would wash and wax the car, vacuum, dust, clean windows, sort laundry and much, much more.

Dan did a lot of the prep work for cooking.  He would take a whole chicken, clean it, cut it into pieces and bread it.  Next, he would put the oil in the frying pan and say, “Okay Jules, now it’s your turn because I can’t tell how high the flame is.  He would use the timer on the talking watch he received from blind services, to time the food and tell me when to flip it, put it in the oven, etc.  Dan could use the microwave on his own (by using raised dots we put on it, the stove and dryer.  Once I came home from doing some grocery shopping and he had made and cooked meat loaf—from scratch--using a recipe one of our neighbors (Patricia) gave us! 

Another time, while I was posting a column and e-mailing it out, my new BFF, Jayne, came over and I didn’t realize Dan was making macaroni and cheese and she said “Dan, be careful.”  When I would tell some women all Dan did as a totally blind person, they would say, "Wow!  My husband can see and he doesn't help me with the housework."

Let me digress for a moment.  Danny and I always prayed for guidance from the Lord in our lives.  

God the Father, always knows what’s best for us.  Danny said the best thing that came from the loss of his eyesight was the fact that he reconciled with his sister, Helen.  Dan also said it’s a good thing his Mother, Sophie, passed away when she did because it would have broke her heart to see her son go blind.

So, let me repeat, things happen in life because the Lord knows what’s best for us…after all, He knew all of us in the womb…indeed, He knew us before any of our parents met and, for that matter, thousands of years before any of us were born. 

While in the hospital, Dan was joking with Jim Hostetter--our best friend from Lincoln and fellow Jeff Street Christian Church member--and he asked Dan if he knew he was terminal and Dan replied, “Yes.”  

My beloved Dan told another good friend, Northern Dan (Gura), aka Also Dan [who has a great sense of humor, albeit not always politically correct--which I believe is a good thing], “the next person I SEE will be Jesus.”  By the way, Northern Dan called my beloved Dan “Southern Dan”…even though we live in Central Illinois and if you don’t get the fact this is a joke, you’re not from the Chicago area. 

By the way, one beautiful summer day Dan and I were sitting on our porch with Jim and Brenda Hostetter and they asked if we had any family in the area.  When we replied “no” Brenda said “consider us your family.”  We both wept with tears of joy!  Well, I could write a book to tell you how much Jim and Brenda have done for us (and so many others in Lincoln) over the years, but I won’t.  In fact, I could write a number of books to relate so many things, but I’m not a writer.  I'm an editor, although you won't be able to tell after reading my words here.  

The greatest compliment Dan ever received as a person was:  “You must be a Christian.”  And he got that compliment because actions speak louder than words. 

As a writer, the greatest compliment Dan ever received: “If Dan Zanoza said it, it must be true!” 

A Chicago Tribune reporter once called Dan “the Matt Drudge of Illinois politics.”  But actually, even though my beloved husband and best friend of 37 years often wrote about political issues, he did not like the political side or aspect of it.

Dan wrote on many topics related to the pro-family agenda, including the rights of the innocent unborn and end of life issues and we posted many articles on end of life issues written by Bill Beckman (Illinois Right to Life Committee) on hospice care, palliative care, living wills and more. 

Of course, I miss Danny very, very much and will always love him.  But I take great comfort in knowing I will join him—some day, according to God's perfect timing. 

Right now, I’m taking things one day at a time.  I’m praying for the Lord’s guidance and, as always, my prayers are “According to God's will”.  Dan said how sad it must be for those who do not believe in God and do not have the hope of eternal life in Heaven that we as believers have.

Danny will be missed by many, but his memory, including his serious and comedic sides will live on forever with his family, my family, our many friends, neighbors, church family and fellow pro-life/pro-family warriors.  And thanks to technology, Dan's writings will be out there in Cyberspace...for who knows how long…except, of course, the Lord.

Thanks to everyone who prayed, sent cards, notes, helped Dan and me in so many ways…before we knew Dan was terminal and after he joined God the Father, His Son Jesus and the Holy Spirit.  They are too numerous to mention (and thank) and I would not want to leave even one person out because no matter how you helped us both out, you will never truly know how much it was (and is) deeply appreciated.  We are truly blessed.  I even received cards from people I did not know, but they had read Dan's articles from our website/blog, RFFM.org.  I truly have been overwhelmed and blessed. 

I must thank my sister, Ann and her husband Tommy Greybill, my brothers Jeremiah and Jimmy Cleary, my niece Michelle Greybill, Dan's sister (my sister-in-law) Helen Stacey and her husband Hank, our "Busia" Arlene Sawicki, Pastor Dustin Fulton (another SNSC member) and our Jeff St. Church family, Dr.Tonimarie Vincent and Tom Brejcha (who, among others, including Bobby Shindler [Terry Schiavo's brother] helped me keep Dan out of hospice care).  God bless the Rev.Lainie Dowell (for her counsel) and Dr. Laurie Roth!  Also, thank you to Bill Beckman; and Mary Anne Hackett of Catholic Citizens of Illinois.  God bless the Rev. Bernie Lutchman, Dan’s Bible study buddies (Business Men In Christ of Springfield), Henry and Ida Johnson of Jeff St. Church.  Wow!  This thank you list can be longer than the column.   

Thanks to some great people at Abraham Lincoln Memorial Hospital in Lincoln and St. John’s Hospital in Springfield, including volunteers.  Well, I guess that’s enough, I’m sure you (and anyone who reads this) will forgive me if I don’t mention you.  David Curtin, former head of the Illinois Christian Coalition, who is now in a seminary studying for the priesthood, once told us “edit ‘til it hurts.”  But, in this case, I feel it would hurt more to edit, if you catch my drift…no pun intended, especially after last week’s blizzard.

Did I thank David Smith, of the Illinois Family Institute? If not, thanks, Dave!  And thanks to IFI's Bruce Tincknell.  Also, thanks to Bernie Schoenburg of the Springfield State Journal-Register, and thanks toTony Cameron, Mike Pawlecki...Thanks to Jean Cohoon...you probably don't realize how much you helped me.

To Bob Wood, thank you!  God, as always, put you (and others) in our lives exactly when we needed you...because God is so good.

And an extra special thanks and God bless you to Beth and Rick Rogers, who spent time with Dan in the hospital on Christmas Day because I woke up to 5.5 inches of snow in Lincoln and could not be in Springfield with Dan.  I know God was with Dan at all times, but Dan also had two God-fearing, God-loving friends with him on the day we celebrate Christ's birth.  Beth is a member of the SNSC; Beth played her guitar and sang a song during the “Celebration of Dan Zanoza's Life” service in Lincoln with Bill Lewis, the musical director at Jeff St. Church.  Thanks, Bill! 

Thanks to our Pastor Dustin Fulton (another SNSC member), the ladies who helped prepare the dinner at Jeff St. Christian Church in Lincoln and those who donated food and their precious time.  Thanks to Everett Crowell, also of Jeff St.

I better stop with all the thank you's or I'll be typing 'til Judgement Day, thanking almost everyone Dan and I know...including so many of our neighbors, the Hart's, Barger's, Betty Sims, the Mileham's, etc. who helped us...before and after Dan went to his Heavenly reward.  And thanks to the friends from our old neighborhood in Crestwood, like Bill and Sandy, Chris and Larry...   

I hope I don't offend those I did not mention here who helped both Dan and myself.  In fact, I had this posted and realized I left out some special people.  I almost used the word "important", but God reminded me we are all special in His eyes.

And to all the mighty prayer warriors who prayed for Dan’s healing…thank you!  Danny received the ultimate healing!  Alleluia!

May God bless all of you greatly!

Danny, you are now MY angel!   I will always cherish our love, memories (both good and bad, as all married couples have) and almost 37 years together!  I know we will meet again in Heaven.  Danny, I love you and miss you very, very much!  Your earthly ministry is now over and I will wait to see what ministry the Lord has in mind for me.  Maybe He has many ministries in mind for me.  But I know the Lord will let me know what to do and when. 

From your loving wife, who has inheritied your same sense of humor.  I am so blessed the Lord introduced us.  Thank you, Lord!  And one day, I, too, will inherit the Kingdom of Heaven and join you...again, according to God's perfect timing.

Danny, I will always love you!  

Julie

P.S.  To be continued at a later date, God willing!  

By the way, I'm praying, according to God's will, for the "conversion" of central Illinois residents, most, if not all, who are not Chicago White Sox fans!  But, like Dan said, "no one's perfect"!  And like I said to "Northern Dan" Gura, after the last Super Bowl, “I hoped God had the game blocked out in Heaven so Dan couldn’t SEE the Packers beat the Steelers.”  By the way, my Mother-in-law was from Pittsburgh; and Dan and his Mom watched the Chicago Bears every Sunday, unless they were on Monday Night Football!  

Hey, Dan, love of my life...Super Bowl Shuffle!  "...I'm Momma's boy Otis, the ladies all love me for my body and my mind." :)   If you saw that video, you'll understand the smiley face.  It's something Dan and I laughed about not long before he went in the hospital. 

Wow, some editor I am...but how can I edit words out which came from my heart (and the Lord) about my husband, a man I spent almost 37 years with?  And how can I edit out all the thank you's?  

Thank you, Jesus, for blessing me and Dan so much.  But most of all, thank you, Heavenly Father, for what your Son Jesus suffered for us, in order that we may have eternal salvation!  Read John 3:16

U.S. Census Bureau Finds New Ways To Waste Taxpayer Dollars

by RFFM.org Staff Writer

 

RFFM.org is reporting the United States Census Bureau is making phone calls, contacting households which have already returned their 2010 census forms. 

 

Some accused the U.S. Census Bureau of wasting taxpayer dollars when letters were sent out in advance informing every U.S. household that they would soon be receiving a census form in the mail.  A week later, the forms arrived.  The next week, a follow-up letter was issued which said, in essence, by now you should have received your form and sent it back to comply with federal law.  It is not known how much these extra mailings cost American taxpayers.

 

But more taxpayer dollars may be wasted because the United State Census Bureau is contacting households--who have already returned their census surveys--to confirm information submitted on the original U.S. Census Bureau document. 

"I was shocked," said a central Illinois resident who requested anonymity.  "I received a phone call on June 15th from a census worker who was essentially reviewing with me the information I had already mailed in.  My wife and I are in our late 50's and this worker was asking me if we had any newborn children since submitting the original document.  I questioned the caller why the Census Bureau was wasting taxpayer dollars with such a redundant phone call.  I also became concerned that the caller might not have been connected with the Census Bureau because I know of no one who had ever received such a phone call during past or current census taking periods." 

When asked, the Census worker provided this individual with a toll-free number [1-866-851-2010] to call the Census Bureau, in order to confirm the call was legitimate.  The individual was also provided an eight digit case number to refer to regarding their census form. 

"The very next day, June 16th, I received another phone call from a different census worker.  I told him I had received a call the previous day and would not answer his questions and promptly hung up.  These phone calls were a clear waste of my taxpayer dollars," said the irate central Illinois resident. 

The Census Bureau has always hired workers to visit households who did not return their surveys and this procedure is still a part of the census taking process. 

However, RFFM.org is not aware of any time in the past when a phone bank system has been used to contact those who have complied with federal law.

From April 25th through May 1st, 2010 the U.S. Census Bureau website http://2010.census.gov/news/releases/jobs/temp-workers.html reported 575,700 temporary workers were employed for the 12 Regional Census Centers which cover the entire U.S.  The website does not provide a break down of how many of these temporary workers are participating in the phone bank system.

Some estimate these phone calls may be costing American taxpayers millions of dollars.  RFFM.org is reporting possibly thousands of similiar follow-up phone calls are being made by Census Bureau employees. 

The U.S. Census Bureau could not be reached for comment regarding the issue.

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  [email protected]

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

To make a secure online donation to support RFFM (Republicans For Fair Media), please go to:  https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=5U5V8GAKCYTU8

Barack Obama's Birth Certificate: Researcher Says Issue Not Resolved Despite Media Dismissal

by Andy Martin

 

EDITOR'S NOTE:  Andy Martin is an author, Internet columnist and media critic.*  Martin is currently promoting his best-selling book, "Obama: The Man Behind The Mask" and promoting his new Internet movie "Obama: The Hawai’i years."  Martin is Executive Editor and publisher of www.ContrarianCommentary.com.  Martin holds a Juris Doctor degree from the University of Illinois College of Law and is a former adjunct professor of law at the City University of New York.

 

Why Obama’s Personal History Still Matters:

 

Barack Obama has been in the White House for over a year, but his past remains a mystery to the American people.  While Obama's "birth certificate" has become the butt of jokes on late-night TV, serious inquiry into Obama's origins has been covered-up by the mainstream media.  Every American should be outraged at how the establishment press has sought to conceal the truth about Barack Obama's origins.

 

Obama's inner circle probably believed that doubts about the President's personal history would dissipate after the 2008 election.  On the contrary, questions about Mr. Obama's "roots" continue to grow in intensity.

 

Only one person outside Obama's family has apparently ever seen his original 1961 birth certificate.  The Director of the Hawai’i Department of Health (HDOH) claims to have seen the document, and to have it in safekeeping, but no one else admits to seeing the document.

 

No one has seen Obama's college records at Occidental College, Columbia University or Harvard Law School either.

 

I began writing investigative analysis about Obama in 2004 and, for the past six years, I have been maligned by Obama's toadies in the media.  The mainstream press "invented" Obama and they continue to have a massive investment in his survival and success.  Anyone who stands up to the media is attacked, ridiculed and becomes the target of left-wing character assassination.

 

So, what are the facts, and what are we doing about them?

 

First, Obama has sought to pretend that he has released a 'birth certificate."  That is simply untrue.  What Obama released was a "certificate of live birth" (COLB) which was produced by a laser printer from a database at the HDOH.  The HDOH birth records are a database, not a repository of documents which have been scanned into a computer.  The "certificate" is merely an acknowledgement that an original record of some sort exists elsewhere.

 

What is Obama hiding?  Why won't he release the original typewritten 1961 document?  There is obviously information on Obama's original typewritten birth certificate (which contains considerable more detail than the summary COLB) that Obama does not want the American people to see.

 

As for Obama's college records, not a single page has surfaced.  In the absence of facts and documents, numerous theories about why Obama is hiding his educational records have arisen to explain this secrecy.  Perhaps the President is embarrassed because in 2008 evidence surfaced that his law school career had been partly financed by an anti-Semitic, Black nationalist agent for Saudi Arabia (Khalid al-Mansour).

 

In October, 2008 I made the initial trip which would be part of a continuing series of research missions to Hawai’i.  I was the first investigative writer to ever search for Obama's past in Honolulu.  The media had merely accepted Obama's unsubstantiated claims, and no one had ever made any attempt to authenticate them before I landed in the Aloha State.

 

Since 2008, I have returned to Hawai’i to continue the battle for access to Obama's hidden history.  We (Contrarian Commentary) are pursing what I believe is the only pending lawsuit ever filed in Hawai’i to pry loose the original 1961 birth certificate.

 

In 2009, we took part in the production of the first film in Hawai’i documenting the unanswered questions about Obama, titled:  "Obama: The Hawai’i Years."  [There will be a separate link to the film shortly, but it can be seen on my former campaign web site at this link:  http://www.andyforussenator.com/the_hawaii_years.htm]

 

Almost every day I receive e-mails with articles, questions and stories from Americans who have concerns about Obama's origins.  The latest individual to have questions regarding this issue is a military officer: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=137013

 

There have been many others who challenged Obama's authenticity and eligibility to serve as President.

 

It is not easy standing up to the President of the United States.  After raising questions about Obama's radical history, and becoming the first person to accuse Obama of being a socialist on national TV in 2008, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8zj_Fj3QpY&annotation_id=annotation_259119&feature=iv, Obama's minions, led by Robert gibbs, launched a hate campaign againt me, and unleashed the New York Times to dredge up irrelevant arguments in a desperate effort to undermine my research.  Their smear efforts boomeranged and drew more attention to my investigations.

 

On Sean Hannity's program (FOX NEWS) (see link above) I compared Obama to a future Hugo Chavez; my chilling prediction is now true.  Obama has brought Chicago's gangster politics to the White House.

 

Obama's harassment against me continues.  Last year, one of his operatives stole a tape I had produced.  I am still in court trying to recover that tape.

 

Obama is trying very hard to derail ongoing research and to defeat efforts to search for the truth.  Why?

 

Unlike some Obama opponents who have solicited funds, and pocketed the proceeds, I plow every penny that is contributed into more research.  I donated the profits from my book to the search for the truth.  I think Obama fears me more than other critics because I have maintained the highest standards of scholarly research and fairness: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZwON6dKHks

 

Of course, some of Obama's opponents have actually assisted the presidential poseur.  By publishing outlandish theories about Obama's birth without any underlying factual basis to do so, there are those the media has labeled as "birthers."  Obama loves the birthers.  He uses them to undermine my legitimate research.

 

I am not a birther.  I am a doubter.  No one can study Obama's family history in Hawai’i, as I have, without having serious doubts as to the veracity of Obama's claims.

 

I am planning a new research mission to Hawai’i beginning on April 27th.

 

All we are trying to do is unearth the facts about Barack Obama's true origins.  The American people deserve the truth and nothing but the truth about Barack Obama.  I hope you agree.

 

* FOR MORE INFORMATION, GO TO:  www.AndyMartin.com  

 

UPDATES:

www.Twitter.com/AndyMartinUSA

www.Facebook.com/AndyMartin

 

www.ContrarianCommentary.blogspot.com

www.contrariancommentary.wordpress.com

MEDIA CONTACT: (866) 706-2639

E-MAIL: [email protected] 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact: [email protected] 

 

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

 

How you can help RFFM.org inform America about political and social issues:
http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2010/01/rffmorg-needs-your-help.html

Homosexual Marriage: A Sure Budget Buster, Come One, Come All

EDITOR'S NOTE:  Beth Rogers is a community activist from central Illinois.

I recently saw a lady on the news who lost her job and is desperate for health insurance.  Now she is advertising herself on YouTube to marry someone who has good health insurance and that's the only reason she wants to get married because of her pre-existing condition and desperate health situation.  She is looking for a man, but in today's world she could marry a woman just to get health insurance. 

I'm thinking that homosexual marriage is going to open up the door for people to get married just for that reason.  For instance, two straight friends could get married just so that the other can have health insurance.  If two people of the same sex are allowed to marry, there's nothing in the law that says they can't wed whether they are straight or homosexual.  We've added same sex as another legal class of people to the definition of marriage.  Just marry your friends to give them benefits.  Same sex marriage means extended benefits and, if we include polygamy into the legal definition of marriage, then everybody should be able to have health benefits.  And they say homosexual marriage doesn't affect any one else?

Beth Rogers

How you can help RFFM.org inform America about political and social issues.
http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2010/01/rffmorg-needs-your-help.html

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  [email protected]  

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Kelly Receives Endorsement of Family PAC Federal? It's An Embarrassment!

by Daniel T. Zanoza, Executive Director

 

I recently learned Family PAC Federal endorsed Republican candidate for Illinois state Comptroller William J. Kelly http://www.family-pac.com/?page=sc.  I find this amazing!  Does Paul Caprio, the Director of Family PAC, properly vet the people his organization endorses?  I guess not.

 

Here's a little refresher for those of you who are not familiar with Mr. Kelly.  I first learned of him when he came down to visit the Springfield, Illinois state Capitol Rotunda Building where a Nativity scene stood among other religious displays and signs of dissent.  Kelly's mission was meant to be a publicity stunt.  He came to Springfield a few days before Christmas to remove a display from the ACLU which Kelly thought contained hate speech..  Mr. Kelly was confused because the ACLU signage actually supported the rights of the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee to sponsor a crèche in the state Capitol building.

 

When Mr. Kelly arrived on his white horse--like 12th Century King Richard leading the Crusades to liberate the Holy Land--he learned his mission was flawed.  The sign he really wanted to take down was from a Wisconsin-based group called the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF).  Kelly ended up being escorted out of the Rotunda by 15 state Capitol Police officers, after he attempted to tamper with the FFRF sign.  The police were waiting for Mr. Kelly because he put out a press release the day before announcing his intentions.

 

Obviously, Kelly was operating in some kind of intellectual fog.  Kelly believed the state was funding these displays.  But Kelly's trip was meant to magnify his own self-importance, in an attempt to gain publicity and favor with pro-family voters in Illinois.

 

Didn't Kelly know all the signage, including the Nativity scene, were privately-funded under federal law.  Nope!  And Kelly's stunt cost the state money.

 

Now I must admit, Kelly did call me.  As Chairman of the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee, he thought I would be happy with his actions.  In fact, this is quite to the contrary.   As I wrote in a previous column, the juxtaposition between the hateful speech on the FFRF sign and the message of hope and forgiveness conveyed by the Nativity scene serves the purpose of Christianity well.

 

But Kelly did not call me before his mission.  By the way, the FFRF is a group which really advocates paganism, not atheism, as their sign implies.

 

I asked Kelly for an apology and he gave me one which I accepted.  I thought the issue was over, until I learned this genius was going around to pro-family groups touting his Crusader-like mission to Springfield.

 

Here's the problem.  The Springfield Nativity scene does not need the controversy created by Mr. Kelly's self-serving foray.  A Nativity scene which stood in the capitol of Washington state was thrown out of that governmental building, along with other displays because of the controversy which took place in Olympia.  I don't want that to happen in Illinois and neither do the following members of the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee which include: Thomas Brejcha, Esq., Chicago-based Thomas More Society; Jean Cohoon, Eureka; Eunice Conn, Polo; Karl Fritz, Chicago; Pastor Dustin Fulton, Jefferson St. Christian Church, Lincoln; Daniel Gura, Lake Zurich; State Sen. Chris Lauzen, Aurora "acting as a private citizen"; Bernie Lutchman, Springfield; Beth Rogers, Springfield; Arlene Sawicki, South Barrington; Dave Smith, Illinois Family Institute and Julie Zanoza, Lincoln.

 

Here is another important point that should be considered by everyone who will cast a vote in the February 2nd Republican primary, including Mr. Caprio.  If Kelly did not know the facts about the only remaining Nativity scene to stand in any state capitol in America, including how it is funded, why should Illinois residents trust Kelly with our money during the greatest financial crisis in our state and nation's history.

 

But there's more about Mr. Kelly.  He is trying to appeal to pro-family voters, but what he makes public about his lifestyle presents a very different image of the man.  Kelly says Hugh Hefner, the king of pornography, which has destroyed the lives of millions, is his hero.

 

A column by Bernie Schoenburg of the Springfield State Journal-Register http://www.sj-r.com/opinions/x1136811925/Bernard-Schoenburg-Hoffman-Giannoulias-duel-over-Bright-Start-accord provides a glimpse into Kelly's private life made public by himself on YouTube.

 

Here are some of the titles of Mr. Kelly's "pro-family" video catalogue:

 

The featured video:  Bill Teams up with Cheap Trick's Rick Nielsen http://www.youtube.com/user/upscaletv 

Words from Kelly's website: Nielsen to Bill: You're drunk...but in a good way. Kelly smiles and shrugs: Is there any other way?! Another wild William J. Kelly moment...CAUGHT ON TAPE!

 

Bill Channels John Dillinger:  http://www.youtube.com/user/upscaletv#p/a/u/2/x80i90LlteY 

 

Bill's Playboy Party with Kendra  http://www.youtube.com/user/upscaletv#p/a/CF55A42D637D05C3/0/zhuVwm7Id-U 

Words from Kelly's website:  It's Bill's first ever Playboy Party and he meets up with Hef's girlfriend...the gorgeous Kendra Wilkenson from E!'s Girls Next Door...and what a wild Upscale night it is. The question is...how long will it take Bill to get smashed this time? If the past is any indicator...it won't be long!

 

Not exactly pro-family images.  Is this the kind of candidate Paul Caprio is endorsing these days?  Frankly, I don't believe Caprio is aware of Mr. Kelly's high jinks.  At least I hope not, but he should be. However, if Bernie Schoenberg of the Springfield State Journal-Register is aware of Kelly's lifestyle, shouldn't the leader of one of the most important pro-family political action committees be? 

 

It certainly seems like Mr. Kelly has some personal issues to deal with.  Perhaps Kelly needs the prayers of the pro-family movement and not their vote.

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

 

Illinois State Comptroller Candidate William J. Kelly Uses Springfield Nativity Scene For Publicity Stunt:  http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2009/12/illinois-state-comptroller-candidate-william-j-kelly-uses-springfield-nativity-scene-for-publicity-s.html

 

If William Kelly Does Not Understand Simple Facts About Displays In Illinois State Capitol Building, How Can He Be Comptroller For Entire State? http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2009/12/if-william-kelly-does-not-understand-simple-facts-about-displays-in-illinois-state-capitol-building-.html

 

State Journal-Register article by Bernie Schoenburg: Surely he jests:  http://www.sj-r.com/opinions/x1136811925/Bernard-Schoenburg-Hoffman-Giannoulias-duel-over-Bright-Start-accord

 

 

How you can help RFFM.org inform America about political and social issues. http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2010/01/rffmorg-needs-your-help.html

 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  [email protected]

 

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

State Journal-Register article by Bernie Schoenburg: Surely he jests:  http://www.sj-r.com/opinions/x1136811925/Bernard-Schoenburg-Hoffman-Giannoulias-duel-over-Bright-Start-accord

Mark Kirk, A Homosexual? GOP U.S. Senate Opponent Andy Martin's Radio Ads Open Can Of Political Worms

by Daniel T. Zanoza, Executive Director

 

Ever since Mark Kirk announced his campaign seeking the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate seat in Illinois currently held by Roland Burris there have been many "rumors" regarding Kirk's sexual preferences.  Indeed, these "rumors" have been around for years concerning Mark Kirk, but they have been dismissed because of Kirk's relatively low political profile.  Journalistically, it would have been irresponsible of me to go with the story for a number of reasons. 

 

Some have asked me why I did not address the allegations Kirk was possibly a homosexual and, for any honest journalist, the answer should be obvious.  My reply was:  If someone comes to me with incriminating evidence regarding Kirk's sexuality, I would consider it a story.  It would take an individual coming forward with photos, videotapes, and/or communications back and forth indicating a homosexual relationship which Kirk took place in.  My standards would have been very high before running with the story.  Of course, this is in contrast to modern day journalism which has abandoned the true tenets of the profession.  However, in many cases, the tabloids, including the National Enquirer, have been more accurate in their coverage of controversial issues.  This is a sad statement when the tabloid press can be trusted more than the mainstream media.  Yes, the tabloids have stories about UFO abductions, wild conspiracy theories and other issues meant to titillate the public. 

 

However, in recent years, the mainstream media has sold its soul to political correctness, a left wing political agenda and what I call journalism by omission.  For example, it took two individuals barely out of college to break the story which exposed the corruption within ACORN.  Charlie Gibson, the former anchor of ABC News, when asked about the allegations of widespread corruption uncovered by the two twenty-something's responded by chuckling and saying, "we'll leave that story to cable."  Gibson was inferring, for obvious political reasons, that the serious allegations surrounding ACORN had no merit. 

 

Most Americans now agree the dominant media has a clear political agenda which led to the election of Barack Obama and, until this day, does its best to cover up stories that might reflect poorly on the Obama administration. 

 

On Monday, December 28, 2009, Andy Martin, a candidate seeking the Republican senatorial nomination, created a firestorm when he brought the question regarding Mark Kirk's possible homosexuality to public light.  Martin's radio ads are now running across the state and the subject matter of "rumors" about Kirk's alleged homosexuality went viral.  In essence, Martin used a statement by a supporter of one of his Republican political opponents to breach the issue of the "rumors" which have dogged Kirk for years from GOP political insiders.  The "rumors" of U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk's sexual preferences have been percolating just under the surface of the political ether.  What Martin's ad accomplished is to force Kirk to address the subject.

 

Kirk, a U.S. Naval Intelligence Officer, is currently on active duty, which is very convenient for him in many ways.  Being unavailable for comment, it allows his campaign team time to figure out a strategy to combat these allegations of homosexuality which, if true, would doom his U.S. Senate bid. 

 

Yes, I know, what consenting adults do behind closed doors is something that has become sacrosanct in a politically correct world.  At least that is the mainstream media's take on the subject, especially when it applies to Democrats.  Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) actually lived in a home in which his same-sex partner was running a brothel for homosexuals.  This is a fact, not a rumor, but if it were a Republican who was caught up in a similar situation, he would have disappeared from the political scene years ago. 

 

Many agree the dominant media would like to see Mark Kirk win the Republican primary for the U.S. Senate.  Kirk, who languished in virtual anonymity since he replaced long time Republican incumbent John Porter as the U.S. Representative for Illinois' 10th Congressional District, has suddenly received an inordinate amount of attention from the dominant press both in Illinois and nationally.  Kirk, who is currently in his fifth term in the U.S. House of Reps., is widely portrayed as the clear frontrunner in the GOP primary for the U.S. Senate by the liberal mainstream media. 

 

However, Kirk has come under withering fire from Illinois Republicans regarding his voting record.  Yet clearly in violation of political protocol, individuals, including Illinois GOP Chairman Pat Brady, have openly endorsed Kirk's candidacy and encouraged Party leaders to follow suit.  In actuality, the Republican establishment should not endorse a candidate before the Party's primary which, in this case, is on February 2nd of 2010.  Brady should be neutral in this process, but there have been numerous circumstances when Kirk has been the obvious recipient of the Republican establishment's largesse.  Kirk was even endorsed by national GOP Party Chairman Michael Steele, who later backed off his support for Kirk, after learning of the widespread animosity levied towards Kirk by both fiscal and social conservative Republicans in Illinois. 

 

Kirk now finds himself in an untenable position.  If Kirk came forward and admitted he is a homosexual, he would be in clear violation of the military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy regarding homosexuals openly serving as a member of the U.S. Armed Forces.  Therefore, Kirk is painted in a political corner concerning this situation.  Now that the question is out there regarding his sexual preferences, if Kirk is a homosexual, he cannot tell the truth because if he would do so, it would end his career in the Navy and essentially end his status as a viable candidate in Illinois' U.S. Senate race--no matter how tolerant American society is supposed to be regarding the subject of homosexuality. 

 

Subsequently, one can look at Kirk's situation as being analogous from a legal perspective rather than the political.  Can circumstantial evidence answer the questions which now haunt the minds of many Republican voters in Illinois regarding the "rumors" of Kirk's possible homosexual lifestyle? 

 

Kirk's Voting Record On Issues Related To Homosexuality

 

How has Kirk voted on issues regarding legislation such as the recent hate crime bill signed into law by Barack Obama?  Kirk was one of a handful of Republicans who openly supported a bill which might one day restrict First Amendment speech about the issue of homosexuality.  For example, in some nations, under penalty of law, ministers can no longer quote Holy Scripture and the writings therein, citing homosexuality as an abomination to God.  Many who are critical of the hate crimes law believe the slippery slope theory will one day take effect in the United States as well and those who oppose homosexuality on religious and moral grounds will be subject to fine and/or imprisonment. 

 

Kirk is also a co-sponsor of ENDA (Employment Non-Discrimination Act), legislation pending in the U.S. House of Reps. and the Senate that, if passed, would ban discrimination in the workplace based on a person's sexual orientation.  ENDA would also protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual individuals.  The bill would protect this group from discriminatory hiring, firing, promotion or compensation practices, as well as retaliation for reporting such practices. 

 

The main sponsor of the House bill (H.R. 3017) is Barney Frank, an open homosexual with a radical agenda.  Mark Kirk is only one of two Republicans who are co-sponsors of the legislation in Illinois, along with Judy Biggert (R-Naperville).  Other Illinois U.S. Reps. who are co-sponsors of the bill include Danny Davis (D-Chicago), Bill Foster (D-St. Charles), Phil Hare (D-Belleville), Jesse Jackson (D-Chicago), Debbie Halvorson (D-Kankakee), Mike Quigley (D-Oak Park), Bobby Rush (D-Chicago) and Jane Schakowsky (D-Chicago).

 

In Illinois, Democratic Senators Roland Burris and Dick Durbin are co-sponsors of a version of the House bill (S.1584) which is virtually the same legislation.

 

Kirk has also been a favorite of Log Cabin Republicans, a single-issue organization devoted to the promotion of the radical homosexual agenda.  They have supported Kirk throughout his entire political career.  One must look for the quid pro quo regarding the Log Cabin Republicans endorsement of Mark Kirk. 

 

Soon, the Obama administration will make an effort to rescind the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy which currently exists regarding members of the U.S. Armed Forces.  Obama made this promise during the run up to his election to the presidency in 2008.  The "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, which was first put in place by the Clinton administration, would essentially allow homosexuals to openly serve in the military.  This would be a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and it would take an act of Congress to change federal law regarding this issue which is clearly a priority on Obama's agenda. 

 

Many political observers believe the current administration will attempt to lift the restrictions on homosexuals openly serving in the U.S. Armed Forces after the health care reform bill is either passed or defeated and Obama makes an effort to ram through Cap and Trade legislation--which many experts agree would devastate America's already depressed economy.  Mark Kirk was one of eight Republicans who voted for Cap and Trade in the House of Reps. which passed the legislative body earlier this year.  After receiving devastating criticism from the Republican faithful, Kirk now says he would change his vote on Cap and Trade--if he had the chance to vote on the legislation again.

 

But the underlying question is:  Has Kirk promised groups, including the Log Cabin Republicans, that he would support Obama's rescinding of the "Don't ask, don't tell" policy which is currently in force. 

 

Finally, Mark Kirk is the only Republican seeking the nomination for the U.S. Senate from Illinois who did not fill out a questionnaire from the Illinois Family Institute (IFI) for use in the not-for-profit group's non-partisan voter guides.  Some of the questions addressed on the pro-family organization's questionnaire which Kirk refused to fill out involved his position on legislation which will directly have influence on pending bills directly related to the homosexual agenda. 

 

Certainly, this is all circumstantial evidence which does not prove Kirk is a homosexual.  But, right or wrong, reasonable individuals may connect the dots on the issues, since the question of Kirk's sexual preferences have come to light. 

 

The Mainstream Media's Agenda 

 

Why would the liberal mainstream media want Mark Kirk to win the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate in Illinois?  After all, the dominant press has also been well aware of the allegations regarding Kirk's possible homosexuality for years.  In Washington, D.C., the allegations regarding Kirk's sexuality are an open secret.  In essence, liberal members of the dominant press would not pursue the issue concerning Kirk's sexuality--until he would have won the GOP nomination.  But it is a fait accompli that if Kirk wins the Illinois Republican primary and becomes the Party's candidate in the 2010 general election for the U.S. Senate, Kirk's Democratic opponent, whoever that may be, would be aided by the liberal press who would doggedly pursue the "rumors" in search of evidence regarding Kirk's sexual preferences.  If the allegations are proven to be true, this would virtually guarantee a Democratic victory in an election year when the Democratic Party is widely predicted to suffer huge losses in the Senate and, especially, the House of Representatives. 

 

Moral & Political Implications

 

But there is a question that looms over this issue like the Sword of Damocles.  I personally believe what consenting adults do behind closed doors is between them and God.  However, this moral and Biblical standard does not apply when it comes to those seeking political office.  It would be naive to believe one's personal behavior would not bleed over into their duties as an elected official who has been given the authority to represent their constituency.  After all, Kirk himself admits he voted in favor of Cap and Trade because this, supposedly, represented the views of those in Illinois' 10th Congressional District. 

 

If Kirk is indeed a homosexual, it would be reasonable to suggest he would have empathy concerning the homosexual agenda which impacts not only Illinois, but our nation as well.  If elected to the Senate, Kirk would be given the power to sponsor, endorse and eventually vote for issues which are not consistent with both the state and national Republican Party platforms.  Therefore, the question regarding whether or not Kirk is a homosexual is germane.

 

The political realities regarding the subject of homosexuality breached in Andy Martin's radio ads bring into serious question whether Kirk is indeed the frontrunner for the GOP nomination to the U.S. Senate in Illinois, no matter what the state's Republican establishment or the mainstream media says concerning the issue. 

 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  [email protected]   

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

If William Kelly Does Not Understand Simple Facts About Displays In Illinois State Capitol Building, How Can He Be Comptroller For Entire State?

Kelly says: "There is a lot of false information coming out about what happened yesterday."  He's right...and it's coming from Kelly.

 

by RFFM.org staff writer

 

On Wednesday, December 23rd, 2009 GOP candidate for Illinois state comptroller, William J. Kelly, attempted to remove a sign placed in the state capitol Rotunda by the Madison, Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation.  A statement on Kelly's website reads, "As a candidate for comptroller, I believe it is absolutely wrong for Illinois’ officials to be spending tax dollars to denigrate and mock good people of faith." 

 

Critics say William Kelly was attempting to use the Springfield Nativity Scene display for his own political agenda.  Kelly's actions were not spontaneous.  RFFM.org learned Kelly issued a press release on December 22, 2009 which read, "GOP candidate for comptroller, William J. Kelly, plans to remove the American Civil Liberty Union’s atheist display at the Illinois Capitol in Springfield, Illinois."

 

Clearly, from the beginning, Kelly did not have his facts in order regarding exactly what was on display in the Illinois state capitol Rotunda building.  Standing in the center of the state capitol floor was a Nativity scene sponsored by the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee.  There was a Hanukkah Menorah also on exhibit; a sign from the Illinois Chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union supporting the right of these religious displays to stand in the state capitol; and an easel which related a message from a group of pagans posing as atheists which call themselves the Freedom From Religion Foundation.  It is obvious Kelly did not actually know who put up the displays in the capitol Rotunda and which groups said what on their signage.  According to his own press release, Kelly originally intended to abscond with the ACLU sign which actually supported the right of the religious displays to stand in the capitol. 

 

Most egregious is the fact Mr. Kelly says, "...it is absolutely wrong for Illinois’ officials to be spending tax dollars..."  The truth of the matter is all of the displays in the state Capitol Rotunda are privately funded.  That's what makes them legal.  This, plus the fact all the displays are temporary demonstrates Kelly acted without possession of the facts involving why the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee was able to erect a Nativity scene for the second year in a row.  The only money Illinois taxpayers spent regarding the displays was the cost involving the 15 law enforcement officers who escorted Kelly out of the Rotunda, before briefly detaining him to write up an incident report. 

 

If Kelly was not in possession of the simple facts regarding his blatant attempt to attract publicity, especially the economic aspects of the issue, some critics ask: "How could Kelly be comptroller for the entire state of Illinois?" 

 

In a phone conversation with Daniel T. Zanoza, Chairman of the Springfield Nativity Scene Committee, Kelly said, "We won't let them take the Nativity scene out of the state capitol building." 

 

"I was stunned," said Zanoza, "I asked Kelly whether he was running for state comptroller, Secretary of State or Governor.  Even if Kelly was elected state comptroller, Kelly would have no input into who could or could not obtain a permit to place a display in the state capitol building.  It was a foolish boast, but I genuinely had compassion for the man because he was so ill-informed."

 

Zanoza went on to say he is happy this year's display of the Nativity scene went on virtually without a hitch.  Thousands of people came to the capitol Rotunda to see the Nativity scene.  One committee member told me she was nearly brought to tears when she saw a family, consisting of a Father, Mother and three young children who were viewing the statues of Joseph, Mary and the Christ child.  A five year old, the oldest of the children, said, "I love baby Jesus!"  With a loving smile, the Father looked at his son and said, "I love baby Jesus, too!"   

 

"This is what the Nativity scene is all about," said Zanoza.  "It is a celebration of the birth of Christ.  It's truly unfortunate there are those who put their own agenda above others."

 

Zanoza says the Springfield, Illinois Nativity scene is not about controversy.  The actions of individuals like Mr. Kelly is what led to officials in the state of Washington prohibiting all groups from displaying any exhibits--religious or otherwise--in that state's capitol building in Olympia.  

 

"I'm kind of glad the Nativity scene is coming down for this Christmas season," said Zanoza.  "We don't need individuals like Kelly ruining something wonderful for their own selfish political purposes." 

 

RELATED ARTICLES: 

 

Illinois State Comptroller Candidate William J. Kelly Uses Springfield Nativity Scene For Publicity Stunt:  http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2009/12/illinois-state-comptroller-candidate-william-j-kelly-uses-springfield-nativity-scene-for-publicity-s.html 

 

State Journal-Register article by Bernie Schoenburg: Surely he jests:  http://www.sj-r.com/opinions/x1136811925/Bernard-Schoenburg-Hoffman-Giannoulias-duel-over-Bright-Start-accord 

 

ACLU Again Not Challenging Springfield, Illinois Nativity Scene: Isn't That Special! It Is: http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2009/11/aclu-again-not-challenging-springfield-illinois-nativity-scene-isnt-that-special-it-is.html 

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  [email protected]

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

U.S. Senate Passes Health Care Reform In Dark Of Night: Who Did Not Read The Bill? Dick Durbin (D-IL) & Others

How Legislation Will Impact You

Commentary by Daniel T. Zanoza, Executive Director

In 2006 I became totally blind.  I don't need to go into the details involving what led to the loss of my eyesight, but because of my experience, I am familiar with how Medicare and Medicaid work in Illinois.  I also understand how the proposed health care reform bill--which cleared a major hurdle due to a procedural vote taken in the United States Senate on Monday, December 21, 2009 at roughly 1 A.M. Central time--would impact those currently receiving Medicare and Medicaid.

Without going into the minutiae regarding parliamentary rules, the vote taken in the U.S. Senate early Monday morning essentially will mean the bill will be passed in the Senate in its current form sometime later this week.  Senate Republicans--who voted en masse against health care reform--have run out of tactics that would delay the official passage of the legislation.

I qualify for and receive Medicare and Medicaid.  Medicare covers roughly 80% of doctor and hospital bills; Medicaid (which is funded by the state of Illinois) pays the majority of the balance for essential health related expenses.  Rules differ from state to state regarding the Medicaid entitlement, dependent upon one's income, including pensions, retirement funds, personal assets, etc.

Obviously, Medicare is a program that is a safety net for both the rich and poor alike.  Without Medicare, health care costs would decimate the financial standing of most Americans.  But Medicare was primarily designed to assist the elderly, the handicapped and those who qualify for the program under survivor benefits.

As many know, President Barack Obama's health care reform bill would reduce Medicare benefits by $500 billion.  Some say, over a ten-year period, these proposed cuts would come closer to $1 trillion.  To put this in perspective, Medicare's budget for a one year period alone is $500 billion.  Under Obama's proposal, essentially one year of Medicare funding would disappear.  Supporters of health care reform claim the reduction in the program's funding would come from elimination of waste and fraud related to Medicare.  I have personally become aware of the fact there is a great deal of wasteful spending in the system.  I receive monthly reports on what Medicare pays to doctors and hospitals and--more than once--I have seen things like double and triple billing for the same procedure.  But in contrast to Obama's allegations, I have rarely seen doctors prescribe tests that were unnecessary.  The truth is, it would not take a massive reform of America's entire health care system to address these problems.  In one particular circumstance, I had one stress test performed at a highly renowned hospital in Chicago.  The records I received indicated Medicare was billed for the same procedure three times.  I called a hotline meant to address Medicare abuse and/or fraud.  However, my attempt to report this abuse fell on deaf ears.  I even contacted a member of Congress regarding the matter who supposedly claimed abuse of this kind was an issue he was deeply concerned about, but I never heard from this Congressman either.  Subsequently, a procedure--which lasted 15 minutes, involving two technicians and a treadmill--cost taxpayers three times the original bill of $600.  It's no wonder Medicare will soon be bankrupt. 

There are good things about Medicare.  I can choose my own doctor, in most cases, although there are some physicians who will not participate in the program.  If I need to see a specialist regarding a medical problem I am having, the wait time to get an appointment is reasonable, although there are situations where it can take weeks to get an appointment with a specialist.  In general, if the costs from abuse and waste were eliminated from Medicare, it would be an entitlement even fiscal conservatives could live with.

On the other hand, my wife's situation is an example of how Medicare would work under the current reforms proposed by liberal Democrats who control both Houses of Congress and the presidency.  My wife no longer works and she has no health care insurance.  Since I lost all my vision, she is reluctant to leave me alone, for even short periods of time, even though I tell her "I will be okay."  The reaction of a loved one in such a situation is understandable because if the circumstances were reversed, I would react in the same manner, probably to a greater degree.

Under Medicaid guidelines in the state of Illinois, I am caught in a Catch 22.  My wife is not covered under Medicare or Medicaid and we cannot afford health care insurance for her.  Subsequently, my wife must pay for her doctor visits, tests and any medications.  She is enrolled in a program at a clinic which accepts patients with little or no income.  The facility is located in Springfield.  A round trip to the clinic is roughly 80 miles and, most important, the wait time to see a doctor is often six weeks or longer.  This program is not free.  The amount one is charged is dependent upon a family's income.  Therefore, my Social Security benefits are included as income and my wife is charged according to a sliding scale.  If tests, x-rays, etc. are needed, (and they require a referral from the attending physician at the clinic), again, costs are determined on a sliding scale.  Such referrals are dependent upon finding a doctor who is willing to participate in the program.  Many physicians and specialists do not accept such referrals, due to the fact the Medicaid program in Illinois is extremely slow in making payments.  The Medicaid program in Illinois is an unfunded mandate which, in great part, has resulted in multi-billion dollar deficits facing the state.  This scenario is repeated in many other states across the nation.

If health care reform is passed by the United States Congress, it will include at least 30 million individuals, like my wife, who do not have health care insurance.  The proponents of health care reform claim the legislation--which would essentially put one-sixth of the American economy under the government's control--would be deficit neutral.  A simple question that must be asked is: 

How will 15 million, 30 million or 47 million people (depending on what numbers you believe) who are currently without health care insurance receive adequate health care without it costing taxpayers literally, in some cases, an arm and a leg?  When health care reform is passed, no matter which version of the bill it will be, there are some realities that will have a great impact on all Americans--for generations to come.

There will be rationing of health care services for those who qualify for Medicare.  Any one who believes this will not be the case is either naive or grossly ill-informed.  Then, there is the most likely scenario which will result in the government taking further control of our daily lives.  Americans will be told what they can eat or drink.  We will be told we must live what some bureaucrat will determine is a healthy lifestyle.  Though the left claims health care reform is meant to benefit the poor, it will, in actuality, hurt, not help low income families. 

I, as an individual who qualifies for Medicare, expect health care services (under any legislation currently being considered by Congress) to be delivered in a clinic-like form of the type my wife is currently enrolled in.  Now, of course, I don't expect to be sitting in a waiting room alongside my wife, Oprah Winfrey, Michael Jordan or Warren Buffett.  With millions of baby boomers reaching the age of retirement, the current system will collapse under its own weight.  Subsequently, there will be a class of citizens--mostly made up of the wealthy--who will be able to choose their own doctors and receive the care provided to those who qualify for Medicare as it now exists.  Then, there will be a vast majority of the public who will be subjected to a grossly inferior health care delivery system.  Many more doctors will refuse to accept Medicare patients because of the bureaucracy involved.  The fiscal demands related to the supposed inclusion of the uninsured into the health care system will drive many physicians who are specialists out of the system because the government will not pay for procedures unless they are approved by bureaucrats in Washington, D.C. 

Here is an example of how rationing will work.  Recently, a very controversial recommendation made by a board of government "experts" suggested women between the ages of 40 and 49 do not need yearly mammograms.  Though this procedure has saved the lives of countless women by detecting breast cancer in its early stages, government bureaucrats, not doctors, will determine the fate of untold millions.  Such boards will be created to determine what other procedures, i.e., tests, x-rays, surgeries, etc. are necessary.  We must keep in mind one of the primary reasons for the recommendations regarding yearly mammograms for women between 40 and 49 not be performed was supposedly based on the anxiety women face when waiting for the results of their mammograms.  The recommendation of the board was met by condemnation from those on the left and the political right--and rightly so.  However, under health care reform, such ridiculous findings will be commonplace, rather than an anomaly. 

After the Senate passes its version of health care reform, the Senate version of the bill and the legislation already passed by the House of Reps. will undergo the committee process where some sort of compromise must be reached.  The final product will again come before both Houses of Congress for a final vote and if passed, the bill will then be brought to Obama's desk for his signature.  There is still time for health care reform legislation to be defeated.  The vote taken by the Senate in the dark of night, while most Americans were sleeping, was a huge step in the process of ramming health care reform down the throats of the public.

Unbelievably, many Senators who voted for the bill, including Democratic majority leaders like Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, did not even take time to read the bill they voted to pass.

However, the results are not a fait accompli.  Yet there are forces, including the pharmaceutical industry and lobbyists representing many different special interest groups (except for those who wish to make America's health care delivery system better) who will apply extreme pressure that will ensure health care reform becomes a reality.  This is despite the wishes of a vast majority of the American public who can look at the issue objectively.

Many Americans admit there is a need for health care reform.  Many individuals, my wife included, do need some form of medical care, besides visiting an emergency room for a slightly sprained ankle.  A common sense approach to the problem is needed, but common sense rarely is the driving force in Washington, D.C.  If I thought health care reform would benefit anyone, I would be for it.  However, in the real world, the result of this legislation will not improve anyone's health care, including my wife's.  There will come a time when those now on Medicare, especially the elderly, will look back at the "good 'ol days" when the money they paid into the system for their entire lives ensured decent medical care.

Here is a crazy idea.  Perhaps a board consisting of average Americans, including people from all walks of life, could be put together to devise a plan that would not only bring health care costs down, but improve health care for those who need it.  But such a board would need to exclude politicians, lobbyists and the special interest groups they represent.  However, don't expect that to happen any time soon.  Though nearly 60% of Americans oppose the health care bills currently being considered by both Houses of Congress, our elected officials are going forward with their plan any way.  The message is:  We are going to help you whether you want the help or not, no matter the cost or consequences to our country.

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  [email protected]  

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.

Dominant Media Fails In Its Duty To Report On Illinois' DCFS: Horror Stories Abound

EDITOR'S NOTE:  This column was first posted on the Illinois Family Institute's web site http://www.illinoisfamily.org/news/contentview.asp?c=34620.  Go to IFI for related stories on DCFS and other issues related to the pro-family agenda.

by Daniel T. Zanoza

A little over a year ago, I wrote a column http://rffm.typepad.com/republicans_for_fair_medi/2008/05/rffmorg-exclusi.html regarding the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services' (DCFS) supposed confidential hotline.  The DCFS hotline itself was a means by which Illinois citizens could report cases of child abuse and/or neglect.  I had a personal experience regarding the use of the confidential hotline which was disturbing, to say the least.
 
I was aware of a family who lived near me in which children were exposed to an unhealthy environment according to anyone's standards.  During a visit to the home, three children (all under the age of ten) were found to be living in filthy conditions.  There was animal excrement on the floors and carpeting which obviously exposed not only the children, but the entire family, to disease.  My wife saw these children walking around in the home barefoot, negotiating their way around feces.  Indeed, when the door to the home was opened, the stench was overwhelming, literally causing us to gag.  While it was apparent that the situation was something this family considered normal, I felt a duty to report this matter to DCFS.
 
I used the DCFS "confidential" hotline in my attempt to notify the state agency regarding the unhealthy conditions these young children were subjected to.  However, to my surprise, I could not make a "confidential" phone call to a hotline which, for many reasons, is designed to protect the confidentiality of those reporting the abuse and neglect of children.  After inquiries, I was told by a DCFS spokesman that those using the hotline had to reveal their personal information or else DCFS would not document their calls.
 
After learning this, I contacted major news organizations in Illinois to expose DCFS' new policy.  It is obvious why a hotline devoted to protecting children must be confidential.  Let me first relate a prior experience I had with the Illinois Dept. of Children and Family Services.
 
A number of years ago, when I resided in the Chicagoland area, I knew a drug-addicted couple who lived in my neighborhood.  I had known this family for years-- in fact, since grade school.  The woman had recently given birth to a child who was born with a drug addiction as a result of her mother's drug use during pregnancy.  Though I wasn't at their home often, it was obvious to me that this baby was in grave danger.  After months of observing the family, the child--who was now six months of age-- had not gained much weight, if any.  In official terms, this is called "failure to thrive."  I thought the situation was so serious and life-threatening to this child, I called DCFS, revealing my name to the state agency.  In response to my report to what was then truly a confidential hotline, a DCFS caseworker visited the home. During a visit to the home, the caseworker saw the condition of the infant, who was living in a dark and damp basement while possibly enduring sexual abuse as well.
 
During the DCFS caseworker's visit, she made a trip to the bathroom,  leaving her files in clear view of the family who I had reported on. They then looked through the caseworker's notes and found my name listed as the individual who filed the complaint.
 
Obviously, the family was not happy with me.  I received threats regarding the incident.  This situation proved to me the importance of confidentiality in reporting instances of child abuse.  (By the way, the baby was ultimately removed from the home due to "failure to thrive."  The child was adopted by a responsible family member, and, to my knowledge, this child is now leading a happy, healthy life, approaching her college years.)
 
I relate this story because I now know DCFS' new policy--which does not allow for reports of child abuse in confidentiality--is putting many thousands of children in danger.  We often hear reports about people who say "I didn't want to get involved."  Unfortunately, this is a result of a culture where too many people feel their involvement in what may be a life or death situation for a child (or for anyone for that matter) is not worth what may come back to them regarding their attempt to be a caring member of our society, simply for being good citizens.
 
The protection of our children should be a priority in our culture.  I do not understand why the mainstream media does not pick up on the story regarding the DCFS hotline and its policy regarding the lack of confidentiality.  However, in essence, DCFS, which I consider a rogue state agency in desperate need of deep and thorough reform, has received a pass from the dominant media, a pass which is putting the lives of children in danger.
 
Since my original story on the DCFS "confidential" hotline, I have received literally dozens of horror stories regarding the actions of this state-run agency, not all related to the confidentiality issue.  Many of the stories had merit and were heart-breaking.  Other reports I received were simply from disgruntled individuals who disagreed with DCFS' decision regarding their family.
 
The duty of the press is to act as a "check and balance" for our government and our society.  The protection of children should be the highest priority of everyone, especially a media which finds itself more interested in political intrigue and the advancement of a liberal political agenda than it does reporting on things that should truly matter.
 
In these days when child abuse is rampant due to the collapse of pro-family values (i.e., divorce, children born out of wedlock, abortion, etc.), children are treated more as a commodity than they are as human beings.  The mainstream media is filled with stories of abduction, sexual abuse, and murder of the most innocent and vulnerable in our society.  Perhaps if the dominant media reported on an agency whose duty is to protect children, it would reveal the root cause of why children are in danger.  And maybe, just maybe, this is a place the press doesn't want to go.

Daniel Zanoza also writes a monthly column for the Illinois Family Institute, titled Media Watch.  IFI's main page:  http://www.illinoisfamily.org/

Anyone wishing to receive RFFM.org e-mails should contact:  [email protected]  

NOTE: Comments to RFFM.org's blog which include ad hominems or personal attack will automatically be rejected.  No hyperlinks allowed.